/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10627003
51

>>10627015
Incorrect

it's like 4 or some shit... maybe 3

>>10627033
Way too low, try again

>>10627003
I got 49

>>10627003
Well it has to be less than or equal to 47 because I just drew a bunch if hexagons on my window like the genius that I am

>>10627055
Just did it with 28 so has to be 28 or less

looks like 49
4*3 + 4*3 at the up and down = 24 + 11 in middle = 35 + 3*2 left and right = 41 + 4*2 for last two

Solution with 48

>>10627003
38 easy

>>10627104
37 what a joke. OPs a fag

>>10627003
Is this supposed to be hard? 37.
3*2=6
4*8=32
6+32=38
38-1=37

46

>>10627119
Fucking idiot

45's the lowest I can get

You need 30 to draw 7 hexagons packed together (1 in the center, 6 around it).

Then 15 more to draw 4 hexagons around the border of that

>>10627003
Does this count? 28 lines

>>10627003
13
no one said they can't intersect, brainlets

>>10627158
wtf I cant even make out 1 hexagon in there

>>10627171
sometimes I forget how dumb /sci/ can be

10 lines, 11 hexagons

beat this faggots

>>10627177
Oh it's an irregular hexagon. I guess if you shrink the width of the image it becomes a hexagon.

>>10627200
irregular hexagons are hexagons you turbo brainlet

>>10627186
Added explanation, >11 hexagons in 10 lines

There are 4 of the reds, 5 of the greens, and at least 2 of the blues

>>10627204
They're a type of hexagon. OP didn't say "any type of hexagon" he just said "hexagon" which implies a regular hexagon.

>>10627223
no it implies hexagon you dumb motherfucker

>>10627223
It needs to be a regular hexagon

9 lines, well over 11 hexagons

>>10627253
>changing the rules after the competition started

>>10627257
Are the hexagons irregular in the original post? No dumb fuck

>>10627329
>they have to be regular because op happened to draw them that way
uh no faggot. Try that shit in a research paper and watch it get rejected.

>>10627347
This.

Also: We don't know Heather's intelligence. She might need up to 406 lines to correctly draw a bunch of regular hexagons. The 2/11 might be a fluke.

>>10627003
Heather is a fucking idiot. I can create way more than 12 hexagons with only 6 lines. Hint: a hexagon is simply a polygon with 6 sides.

what i'm gathering is that the question is ill posed

>>10627003
15 lines?

>>10627072
>>10627095
Lines =/= hexagon side lengths

>>10627329
Are there 11 hexagon in the original post?

>>10627147
They share a side not a point

>>10627377
You need to get 12 regular hexagons broski

>>10627177
Nope where’s the original two brainlet

>>10627363
They need to share a side not point

>>10627418
no one said it needed to include the original two double brainlet

>>10627003
14 lines? 10 small + 2 big ones in the middle

>>10627413
>>10627421
Oh...right

>>10627186
Where’s the original two faggot

>>10627422
Look at the OP it’s in addition too the existing 2 fucking mitochondria

>>10627435
Not him, but you're a retard, sorry.

>>10627158
Based innovator
>>10627257
Based double-innovator
>>10627329
Based seething retard
>>10627351
Based and technicality-pilled

>>10627003
>You should be able
To express your actual question more clearly.

>>10627003
Did it in 9 on a sphere
:note those circles are straight lines when graphed on a sphere.
Who can beat me! This is a nice thread.

>>10627476
Only geodesics are straight lines on a sphere. Concentric circles cannot all be straight lines

Here are 34 hexagons made with 6 lines, and there are many more I haven't identified.

Get rekt.

>>10627257
not requiring that hexagons be regular, thats fine
but allowing concave hexagon?

>>10627003
I solved it the only way I know how.

You could do it with one line on a manifold.

>>10627506
literally what op asked so blame him

>>10627488
Ain’t an equater a straight line I just moved it towards a pole

>>10627536
when you shrink it, it becomes a circle. Lines on a sphere are formed by the intersection with a plane through the center.

>>10627517
Been waiting all thread for this.

>>10627540
I concur thank you anon.

>>10627578
Best answer

Final count: 62 hexagons from 6 lines.

>>10627468
>9 lines
>innovative
See >>10627594

>>10627661


This>>10627594 is fucking brilliant

>>10627003
Do the hexagons have to be regular? Convex?

>>10627694
anything. try both

>>10627476
Can it be done with a single line on the surface of an appropriate polyhedron?

>>10627003
Boom 4 lines 12 perfect hexagons

>>10627003
iMAGINe This BUT WITH a hexagonal BaSe

>>10627594
Winrar, op should commit seppuku and livestream it.

>>10627661
Sorry I can't predict the future. That anon is a triple-innovator.

>>10627515
looks good to me

>>10627517
Someone try this.

>>10627003
19

>>10627515
Correct

>>10627003
47

>>10629477
What's your solution?

>>10627095
You forgot to hook up the water, anon.

>>10627003
Its around about 4 or 5

he clearly meant to say a hexagon of equal sides you autists