/sci/ - Science & Math

bump bump

there's a hiden meaning in analysis if yarr fail it repeatedly

>>10610085
you study from a textbook hahha

evryone knows that a CHAD(tm) studies from a handbook

>>10610085

>all these faggots using textbooks and handbooks
reall niggers use notes typed in latex

>>10610176
The books are all done in latex retard

>>10610176
notes? Taken where faggot, a fucking class?
>wasting time in a classroom, ever
>ISHYGDDT

>not just reading ZFC axioms in Wikipedia and deriving the rest of math from there
Fucking smooth brains.

>>10610317
>accepting axiom of choice
why even speak brainlet?

>>10610145
Ceci

>>10610342
If I gave you an infinite amount of socks I bet you would be able to choose some of them

>>10610145
Bof bof

>>10610342
>can't even choose uncountable quantities
Pathetic

>>10610558
show me how

>>10610731
>have a lot of bags
>show me how to take things from the bags

>>10610224
Not older ones

>>10611594
yeah, show me how you choose one element in each bag from an uncountable amount of bags.

>>10611798
You reach in and pull it out

>>10610292
t. jon tooker

that's right, it's him...

>>10610085
James Stewart's Calculus is a classic

>>10612279
pew

>>10610085
This is good as a second book on linear algebra, otherwise you'll fuck up doing the proofs in the exercsies

>>10612279
>>10612426
That book is trash for the first chapters (topology chapters is good) why the hell would you build R from cuts when nobody else does this? Also little explanations of proofs

What do you use to read your textbooks? I use pic related. Perfect for simultaneous note-taking.

>>10612928
I agree. It's good as a supplement to learn an alternative way to build [math]\mathbb{R}[/math] though

>>10612936
Books from library if possible. Otherwise, read from tablet/phone and take note in papers.

>>10612956
>It's good as a supplement to learn an alternative way to build RR though
That is true, it's a great supplement or second read as it skips over sequences, continuity, differention, integration, etc too quick but then chapters 2 and 4-6 are God tier if you have some prerequisite knowledge

>>10612962
>not taking all your notes in clozed anki flashcards
ISHYGGDT

>>10612031
I can't reach in an uncountable amount of bags.

Describe a proper procedure that I could, for example, implement on my computer and let it run for a while, for example.

>>10613027
>implement on my computer and let it run
>>>/g/

>>10612928
fucking everyone should build R from cuts, it's historic and less abstract for new learners to understand
even rudin builds R from cuts
and if you need more explanation then pugh gives you're not ready for real analysis
>>10612981
you sound like you don't give a shit about analysis at all, you sound like one of those fuckers in calculus who whined every time something was presented without perfect defense. fuck off, we don't want you in analysis.

>>10613159
Hello Pugh

>>10610085
The sheer amount of different things this book explains well is fantastic.

I've studied single variable analysis on this and loved it. Quite difficult for a first year though, but it starts building mathemaical maturity very nicely

The anti-onions

BASED

k

>>10613397
wtf is this

Reminder to read Russian mathematics and physics textbooks, they're based and redpilled.

>>10610085
i see your bid and raise the following

Not what you would call a textbook but still fantastic for anyone interested in mathematics

>>10610151
lmao long ass name nigga

>>10613573
Pretty sure most of it is a title

>>10610085

>>10613561
They’re also poorly translated and there are better English alternatives

>>10613789
The exercises are unparalleled.

>>10613785
I’m gonna get into this after Shilov’s LA. Is it pretty good for beginning analysis?

>>10613352
basato

>>10610136
>second first and first second
wut?

>>10613865
There’s no better book than Tao. He’s truly a genius

>>10614177
I looked through the pdf version. Doesn't seem bad but I know better books

>>10614182
I’ve found it to be the best as an intro since he starts from the peano axioms. The exercises are also amazing.

>>10614328
Admittedly, that's nice when it comes to rigor.

>>10614328
yes analysis has so much to do with the fucking peano axioms
tao is a god damn meme. fuck off stupid taoposter. analysis 1 isn't even fucking analysis.
why would you recommend any book to anyone which isn't pugh???
see >>10612279

>>10614336
Based and pughpilled

>>10614336
>>10614345
based and PughPilled

While the contents of this one are not that interesting. It's interesting comparing how the ancient Chinese approached Mathematics, when to compared to the Greeks (Euclid's Elements).

>>10614336
>Pugh
>Springer
No thanks I’ll stick with Tao. I’m sure he does a good job

>>10614382
ok triptard, enjoy your meme mathematician and his fucking dumbass 5th grade book

>>10614393
>baiting this hard on a Taiwanese doll-collecting forum

>>10613397
benis :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

>>10614162
brainlet, it's making a joke that it's the second time you're viewing first course stuff, while the first time you're going over the second course stuff

>>10614541
I don't know what's worse, the retardation of the question or the autism of your answer.

>>10610136 >>10612279 >>10614336
Principles of Anal.

>>10614546
how would it have been answered with less autism, smarty?

Do you guys some website with these kind of books? Thanks frens

>>10614564
By not answering.

>>10614393
>undergraduate texts in mathematics
Idgaf about this imaginary distinction between “undergraduate” and “graduate” math textbooks. Tao’s analysis is fine. Any gaps in knowledge can be filled in at a later time. Stop sperging this hard

>>10614583
Website for downloading? Libgen.

>>10614583
libgen.io

has a better primer and explanation of group theory than most math textbooks

>>10614328
>best as an intro since he starts from the peano axioms
autism

>>10613924
basato italiano friendo

>>10610085
really old school

>>10610526
ferma ta guele et casse toi, "bof bof". bete af

>>10615087
i have this book, how do i even study it? currently i set it aside because I don't know how to study it like a regular math text book, like calculus for example. there are no practice problems just proof after proof. I don't think memorizing all the propositions is right, and I feel like if i go through each proof and writing notes is time consuming and getting me nowhere, do I just read it?

>>10610085
Am I the only one that find this book boring as shit? Linear Algebra is so fucking dry to me.

>>10615139
No wonder, because linear algebra is dry.

>>10615130
I'm not a historian or some sort, but I think this book is not meant for teaching. It's more like how he showed the world what he discovered. Even so I suppore you can just read it, page after page, since it starts from very basic axioms and everything you need to know and build all the rest from those.

>>10610085
This book makes CSfag to understand what is going on on fermat

>>10615241
How good of this book mathfag? I heard that it's well written but not going far.

>>10615249
*for mathfag

If I see an author/coauthor with a russian first name I assume the book is good

>>10615254
That's pretty racist of you

>>10615259

yeah cause if only the surname is russian he could be american, which is problematic

>>10610085
Nothing here is god tier.

>>10615266
So what is god tier?

>>10615294
Anything I've read

>>10615301
Good one retard

>>10615301
Based

>>10615301
>Award for being the most based person on /sci/

>>10614363
A colleague of mine regularly gives his students an excellent piece of advice. When you confront a general problem and don't see how to solve it, take away half the hypothesis and try to solve it again. If the problem is posed for n dimensions, try to solve it for a Banach space. If the problem assumes some function is continuous does it get easier for any function that satisfies the intermediate value theorem? The idea is to generalize a specific problem to its simplest manifestation, like a metaphor. At the maximum try to find the bare least that makes it true.

>>10615823
Did you just copy the image's text? For what purpose?

>>10615846
It says the exact opposite lad.

>>10615852
whoops, my bad

Fucking zybooks baby

>>10613785
the worst book i've read

One of the best books that I've read. I'd be willing to say it's superior to Atiyah-Macdonald. It certainly contains almost all the material in A/M except the few digressions into Dedekind rings and the Hilbert Polynomial, which could be read independently, and on the other hand contains material on homological algebra, like derived functors and projective/injective modules. At times it felt like it was just copying A/M but the proofs and explanations are more wholesome and complete, so you're basically getting the same treatment but better. Almost at no point was a step in a proof unclear to me. There are barely any results left as exercises. Probably one of my favourite aspects are the introduction before any chapter - I've gained a lot of intuition that I previously didn't have about certain constructions and results.

There exercises are more interspersed to solidify your understanding before moving on to the next chapter. There are fewer exercises, but to be fair many of A/M exercises were algebraic geometry (at the level of schemes) in disguise, and since the book devotes its second half to AG, it is reasonable.

I have only (fully) read the first half of the book devoted to commutative algebra, but I already know the second half, devoted to scheme theory, is not going to disappoint. If you are looking to learn commutative algebra, I recommend you look into this book over Atiyah/Macdonald's.

>>10613182
not science or math

>>10615885
Quit trolling

Verified God-tier coming through.

absolut classic.

Fav textbook to read from back to front more than once.

>>10616103
ive seen this meme thrown around... what value does it have? t. dont know biology

>>10616316
If your professor has you reading a book that's a topseller instead of scans from post-it note drawings his granddaughter made of his work he's a low-effort HACK. The best textbooks are always the most obscure ones.

>>10612928
I thought dedekind cuts was the standard way, what is it then?

>>10616316
The standard freshman textbook for general biology courses. Many people begin to gravitate towards a specific field while reading it and you can sort of build a foundation for evolutionary theory and organismal biology by reading through the later chapters. The cell, ecology, and interspersed orgo are very patchy at best. The discussion of evolution as it pertains to genetics is subpar bordering on retarded but that’s not the point of the book so you can’t fault it for skimming so hard.

>>10610176
>latex
you peasant

If you haven't seen the illustrations inside Homotopical Topology by Fuchs and Fomenko, you should really check it out. They're some of the most beautiful mathematical art I've ever seen. Not really diagrams, just art all over the place.
Not sure what the rules are about posting links to PDFs, but it's pretty easy to find if you look it up.

>>10616804
another pic

>>10610085
/pdfHG/ -- pdf hoarders general

>>10614551
Rudin is a meme.

>>10616809
But it's a good meme.

>>10615130
they used to pay people to memorize theorems till they saw the 'beauty of the math'. also most textbooks outside of america had no questions and came with extra exercise books. if you are serious about reading the elements id recommend reading the theorems intelligently. this means:

1) try proving the stuff yourself first
2) you paraphrase what is going on in the proof and the general game plan
3) try posing questions out of the different propositions
4) get another book full of questions to read out of

you should also be able to recreate the entire proof on your own. ive gone through the first 4 books but took a break to finish another book i was reading

>>10616813
It’s a meme. Nothing more, nothing less.

>>10616316
if you read it with 0 knowledge, you come out with a solid understanding of basic biology.

>>10616359
Do you know of a better textbook?

bump

>>10610144
Was Ramanujan a chad?

>>10613924
rossopasticcato

>>10619027
Holy fuck

>>10619063
Holy fuck is correct "my nigga"

>>10610085

>>10619027
I've heard of this guy. He claimed to have some amazing reactor/generator.

best textbook for undergrad algebra coming through

>>10619090
I'm not your nigga, bud.

>>10619155
I've been posting hype for the GUTCP since it was uploaded in December, but I'm pretty sure nobody cares, or has even downloaded the book. I like the book, and I can't find anything wrong with his math or his logic. I have always been inclined to trust in my intuition, and frankly, I have been given exactly zero valid arguments against the GUTCP. It's just ad hom and strawman. If there was one other sperglord who was reading this book and browsing /sci/ I would know by now. There isn't one.

>>10619185
I don't reject anything blindly. I've already downloaded it and have been reading the introduction. I'll see where it goes.

>>10619228
That's actually wonderful, I eagerly await any and all criticism, commentary and appraisal.

>>10619159

>>10615885
why

>>10619256
>best textbook for undergrad algebra
>graduate studies in mathematics

>>10619278
>imblying Aluffi is more difficult than D&F

Bump

>>10613369
loved parts I and II but there's lots of errata, will definitely buy the second edition when it comes out, this makes pretty much all other qft textbooks obsolete (except weinberg of course)

also the end of chapter problems range from weird to incomprehensible, like you need schwartz exact same neural connections to even understand what the fuck was he even trying to ask in some problems

>>10613397
>HUNGerford

>>10610151
>if an indian poos in the forest and there is no one around to hear it, then what is the purpose of the loo?

>>10613397
looks like a jew made it

OP you faggot get out of pre-math

>>10613562
>>>/g/

>>10613785
"no"

>>10614177
>chinks and POOs subsidizing chinks and POOs

>>10614371
chinamen have been proven to be very predominately right-brained, and it would be a VERY rare chinaman (there hasnt yet been one) that can even VAGUELY come near the left-brained ingenuity of the Western Genius.

>>10614585
not him, and idk who the fuck tao is, but
>"he leaves out the critical substance on purpose. you need to read other books BUT DONT LOSE FAITH IN HIS or...sheesh...i dont even know how to look at you...i bet youve never even heard of Rick and Mort or Big Bang Theory...i totally feel bad for you, guy..."

>>10614964
>cochan
>wont even use "cohen" anymore
sad times

>>10615249
why do people like you, with only an intermediate level (if even...) of English language proficiency, try to debate anything in the English language?

Fucking learn how to speak English FLUENTLY before you even try to engage in or propose an argument in the English language. Until then, you might as well have a debate with a fucking toilet seat. At least youll get some practice.

>>10615301
this is the most clever (i.e. intelligent) comment in this disgusting septic-tank of a thread. and that is very sad.

>>10616806
wow id have to check this out just for the illustrations, if nothing else. anyone who puts that sort of effort into providing a concrete visualization for an audience in order to explain beautifully abstract concepts is worth reading imo. they have a true love for their field(s).

>>10620298
That's a question not a debate you utter buffoon.

>>10610342
This but or also unironically

>>10620303
>this is the most clever (i.e. intelligent) comment
I hope you're being sarcastic

>>10615823
Now it's really two pieces of advice instead of only two.

Brings a tear to my eye

>>10621768
Better than Griffiths' Quantum

>>10620252
>>>/lgbt/

>>10621928
Griffiths quantum has this weird thing going on that it can be decent at times but is lacking. It's not bad but there are probably better books.

>>10610085

This book is pretty much the only fucking reason I initially got into Digital Circuits

>>10612936
>He doesn't read physical

>>10621928
Tooker's vixra vomits are better than Griffiths QM.

>>10614964
This is the best book on C there is

>>10622928
>best book on C
>not Gustedt
you're a shit programmer, mate

>>10610085
fuck sheldon axler

>>10622948
Never even heard of it

>>10622963
that's not something to boast about

>>10622392
i like Digital Electronics Practical Approach, with examples in multisim and vhdl

>tfw /sci/ is too brainlet for probability theory

>>10610085

>>10623075
>>10623075
This is beautiful

>>10622948
I learned C the first time with Kochan and then the second time with Gustedt and I'm basically certain that that's the best way to do it.

>>10622121
The book is just an introduction. It teaches you to solve realistic classical problems in QM. It doesn't teach much about the formality, but that's not always the point

>>10622948
>>10622963
>>10623105

What do you guys use C for?

>>10623367
Great book

>>10623105
I'm convinced the best way to learn C is read Gustedt and then just consult the spec whenever you're not sure of something.
>>10623526
Personally? Nothing. In work, i get to see a lot of C (most of it written by people who didn't learn from Gustedt). I work in consulting, we mostly do formal verification in safety-critical, yuropoor based.

>>10623526
Just fun at the moment, unfortunately. I used it for CUDA-based signal processing stuff at uni though.

>>10623621
That actually sounds pretty intense and cool

>>10623367
>>10613565
true patricians

>>10613397

ironically this,

bought the pdf, got it printed, and gave it a read. its hilariously good at teaching abstract algebra

>>10610085
I really hate axler's approach to abstract linear algebra. I love abstract maths, but his approach seems like pulling shit from the ether. maybe because my professor was just terrible and accentuated how bad i felt about this book

>>10624346
>>10613397
can you upload PDF? its not on libgen

>>10624415
found some book on some appbox website, cant post link cause spam.
is this whole book? 100 pages?

These have been helping me through all my engineering courses. They were my Great Grandfathers who had a Doctorate in Mechanical Engineering. I have over 100+ of these textbooks each on a different topic:
Mechanics. Mechanical Drawing I, II and III, Ballistics, Steam Engine design, Steam engine testing, Material testing, Gearing design and cutting, hydrodynamics, thermodynamics, pneumatics, etc.. Each topic is a whole book instead of one chapter of 5 pages in a physics book, etc. So you can really understand each topic in depth.

Each 100-150 pages. Circa 1920 - International textbook company.

God tier calculus text book?

>>10624596
There are 3. Rudin, Tao, Zorich.

Why is there no consensus on the best intro analysis book here?

>>10624668
If there's a consensus it's a meme.

>>10624674
not-so-subtle rudin suggestion there

>>10610085

>>10610085

Hori et al. - Mirror Symmetry

The first part is an excellent review on background math

Zinn-Justin - Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena

Amazing book on QFT from a condensed matter theory perspective.

Baez & Munian - Gauge Fields, Knots, and Gravity

The first half of this book is probably the best place to learn basic differential geometry. I think the second half of the book is not good. It tries to treat some very advanced topics, but comes across very poorly. The author, Baez, has said on Stack Exchange that he was too ambitious in the second half, and that he would like to make a second edition focusing more on the geometry in the first half.

Bertlmann - Anomalies in Quantum Field Theory

Good modern treatment of anomalies. The first 120 pages are good for geometry.

>>10624477
please scan them and upload them. Or compile a list for us

Smith et al. - An Invitation to Algebraic Geometry

Nice place to learn the basics of varieties. Not too long or complex. Good preparation for books like Shafarevich or Harris.

Griffiths & Harris - Principles of Algebraic Geometry

Pretty old but still covers a lot of topics in (complex) algebraic geometry.

Hatcher - Algebraic Topology

Fairly modern book that covers a lot of older algebraic topology material in a sensible way. Very talky. Either you get what he means or not. For this reason it's helpful to have a lot of motivation for this stuff from elsewhere.

Lieb & Loss - Analysis

Very nice treatment of a couple analysis topics. I can't stand most pure analysis books but I enjoyed this one.

>>10618746
Absolute stud

Rosenlicht - Analysis

Back when I took analysis, this was the book that helped me the most. Bartle was the assigned book. And Rudin was recommended. Rosenlicht made the most sense, reading the others was easy afterwards.

Schutz - A First Course in General Relativity

Explains special relativity and tensors better than any book I've read. To this day I am glad I opted to take the general relativity course my freshman year and that this book was assigned.

>>10616098
>Watson
based

>>10615893
Poor manlet had his gf stolen by chadonomics thundercock.

>>10624477
>>10624812
https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/International_Textbook_Company.html

More or less the full list of the volume of works I have munis the non-engineering stuff. I can scan them but will take quite some time to do so. It is a ton of books.

>>10624927
Any that really stands out I'll write down and try and scan them when I have the time to. I'll post a list of works I have in possession in a bit

>>10610176
this, but notes taken by hand. unironically 99% use this plus notes they sell in the uni and private tutors (last two brainlet tier, i only use class).
>>10613561
Based MIR editorial selling books at cost. based USSR commies gave boomers free education and were the best quality

>>10624927
Part one of collection

>>10624927
Part two of collection

>>10624974
>>10624980
fucking beautiful, anon.

>>10616809
"Rudin is a meme" is a meme.

>>10624980
Looking back into this thread and noticed I accidentally posted the same image twice instead of the two. Here is the real part 1 of the collection

>>10625226
""Rudin is a meme" is a meme." is a meme.

>>10625230
Gonna need these when the micronova wipes out all electronics in 2060

Soviet math is best math

>>10624677
kek

>>10625258
Cringe

At this point I can basically quote the first four chapters by heart.

>>10613565
Kolmogorov was a great man.

>>10626081
Too bad you still don't understand them.

>>10626112
uhh great banter

>>10616809
>mfw Mathematicians choose rudin because they want 90% of their students to drop the course

>>10626132
>yfw mathematicians choose Rudin because they want the surviving 10% of their students to have a solid understanding of anal

>>10610501
Thats not as many socks as I gave yer mum last night

>>10613789
this

Tu will show us we are not afraid

>>10621768
Took E/M this semester and half of my classmates hated this textbook and I don't know why I thought it explained concepts really well and made E/M a real joy.

>>10627018
Were they engineers?

>>10627029
A few, mostly other physics students, tho the ones going into engineering unanimously didn't like it.

>>10615891
Is this an official copypasta now?

>>10627327
i just posted it twice dude

>>10627467
ive seen it 4 times

bump

I have discovered the Stokes theorem, but I don't even understand the symbols used in it. Is there a good book that explains all the underlying theory?
Sorry for the phrasing, but I don't even know what is the name of that theory.

>>10629202
Nobody can understand Strokes theorem. If you can explain it, then the University of New Orleans has promised a million dollar millennium falcon. As the problem is a millennium falcon, there are lots of other scientists going after it, so if you try to understand it, you could face physical threats. I once knew a dude who tried to study the millennium falcon problems, and the Russians put plutonium in his cat. This shit is scary, man. If you want something a little less dangerous, study the universal Tyson Miller theory with shinji mocha frappe.

>>10616806
>Topological hentai
Wow

>>10623074
I'm liking his book on green and brownian motion

I’d like a good chemistry book on the shelf for reference. Any recommendations?

>>10615891
Thanks, I'll check it out.

What's the best linear algebra text?

>>10610085
He's has a new book on integration. Not sure how good it is.
http://measure.axler.net

>>10629308
pls

>>10629202
Any book that does analysis on manifolds. For example, Munkres, Tu, or Lee.

>>10629488>>10629202>>10629469


Meant to say Spivak** too

>>10629202
Differential forms.
If you're in a hurry, Sternberg's Advanced Calc explains it, but I'd recommend doing it properly through Tu's Intro to Manifolds or Lee's Intro to Smooth Manifolds.

>>10629415
First or second course? If first, Strang (look up lectures on youtube MIT), if second, then Axler, or if you're feeling adventurous, Roman. If you don't care so much about practical machinery or analytic stuff, I'd say Aluffi's algebra chapter 0 is goat

>>10629433

lol

>>10629488
>>10629489
>>10629491
Thanks, guys!

>>10624446
some months back I found a physical copy on ebay. I can show it off in a few hours. Is anyone interested? I also have a pdf copy I can share.

Toss me your best intro Diffgeo book

>>10629498
Thanks mate, I've been using your first suggestion.
Any tips from an old hand on LA in general?

>>10629582
I don't know exactly what you mean

From what I interpret, I'd say first you'd need to tell me what your aims are with mathematics. If you're into practical stuff, then you should probably want to be pretty good at it, maybe look into numerical LA or something, I'm not an expert on that.

If you're looking into pure math, then first you'd need to tell me analysis or algebra/geometry. If analysis, I can't really help you much, but know that they do a lot of infinite-dimensional vector spaces there.

If algebra/geometry, then I'd say try to finish ASAP - you can always look things up on the go. Ie just finish the standard course up to Jordan normal form, make sure you understand it well, and quickly pass to studying abstract algebra. The cool stuff of linear algebra only happens under modules (the generalisation of a vector space), and you learn so much more when you understand vector spaces as free modules over a field - homological algebra is basically what linear algebra is meant to be, and it is extremely useful in algebraic topology and geometry, and also in pure algebra like group or ring theory.

If you want to take the algebra path, don't use a book as a guide, use lecture notes instead from any good university and speed through them, while doing exercises from the book the course is based on. You don't want to dwell on basic algebra too much. Once you finish such a first course, I recommend jumping straight to Aluffi's Algebra chapter 0. I cannot recommend the book enough - it's a fast intro to every single algebraic topic, includes hard topics that are somewhat optional (group theory stuff), and gives you a head in group theory, ring theory, commutative algebra, field/galois theory, advanced linear algebra, and homological algebra like no other book.

If you want to go on to algebraic geometry, then >>10615891 is most of the commutative algebra you'll need (it's my review), but I don't recommend jumping straight into scheme theory

>>10629529
>>10629529
how many pages it has?

>>10629630
I am more interested in algebra and geometry, geometry in particular. I like the plan. Thanks a lot, mate.

>>10629644
Check out any lecture notes that cover Euclidean and projective geometry at a second year maths level before you start any more complicated geometry.

Euclidean is really easy and fast, so shouldn't take you too long, but Projective geometry is extremely important everywhere, and requires mostly just linear algebra (the basics at least). So if you're bored when learning all the required algebra for AG or AT, you should check out a more detailed exposition like Eduardo Casas-Alvero's book.

>>10629653
>Check out any lecture notes that cover Euclidean and projective geometry at a second year maths level before you start any more complicated geometry.
Something like:
http://math.ucr.edu/~res/progeom/pg-all.pdf
Or is that too much? There does seem to be a good amount of stuff, just from a cursory search.

>>10629676
Actually, that looks perfect - has all the topics I had in mind without being too long. I was a bit wary of advising Alvero's because it's extremely long and drags on and on with things that are quite obvious at times. Last chapter (conics) are the best way to taste algebraic geometry before going full on.

>>10629202
3blue1brown's video in khanacademy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iaYNaENVH4

>>10629687
Thanks for all the help, mate

>>10613397
>>10613404
>>10614477
>>10620207
>>10620246
>>10624346
>>10624415
>>10624446
>>10629529
>>10629636

Alright here's the pdf: https://mega.nz/#!Uf4STYZD!Rva5uDMj3cOx6SLkYjz4bYadECB_12TprAT1JD0194U

Careful with this one, it's rare. I've also got the hard copy so just ask if you want photos.

>>10624415
>bought the pdf
get a load of this guy

>>10623508
Lol, what kind of dumbass "graduate" needs a course in arithmetic, lol. You learn that in elementary school.

>>10629902
>Imagine wasting time to make something this autistic

>>10629902
I'm fucking stunned

>>10629902
What's a fuckatoric?

>>10629902
lil'minecart /ourguy/? I feel kinda conflicted about these tasteful watermarks... could you do it again with a qt touhou? Maybe you're too young to know what that is....

>>10613785
this book sucks as a proper analysis text. I bought it thinking it was Pugh or Rudin tier, but it's not. It did make a great follow up to Stewart's Caclulus though, but ultimately you will learn more analysis from Spivak's Calculus than this.

Best /sci/ books

- The Periodic Table by Primo Levi
- On Growth and Form by D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson
- The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins
- The Double Helix by James Watson
- The Voyage of the Beagle by Charles Darwin
- Consciousness Explained by Daniel Dennett
- Gödel, Escher, Bach by Douglas Hofstadter
- Mathematics, Form and Function by Saunders Mac Lane
- A Mathematician's Apology by G.H. Hardy
- The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks
- Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! by Richard Feynman
- The Strategy of Conflict by Thomas Schelling

>>10629902
thanks for the bonus touhou .flac but where did you even find it?

>>10630223
An adjective for a sick fuck that fucks tori

>>10630719
Lol

>>10630369
>maybe you're too young to know what touhou is
>there's touhou music in the zip file
lol how embarrassing.

>>10629902
>bought the pdf
I honestly hate you people so much. I actually can't fucking stand ANY of you f-fUCKING BRAINLET PAY2WIN FLOUNDERING INBRED BAKA FAGGOT FUCKS I'LL TEAR EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU ALL LIMB FROM UNDERAGED LIMB HOLY SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!
The ENTIRE FUCKING POINT is to obtain a copy without paying for it YOU PARASITES! This is obviously lil'minecart's second brainlet filter!!!

>>10629902
>>10631634

>tfw i have a free copy without the gay as fuck watermark
jeez im tempted to share, but... piracy is wrong anons! better just use LMC's one!

>>10613785

This is the best book in analysis I've read, and probably the least autistic one. For example, he breaks the definitions of limit related concepts into the language of [math] \epsilon [/math] close, eventual [math] \epsilon [/math] close, [math] \epsilon [/math] steady, continually [math] \epsilon [/math] adherent etc. instead of stacking quantifiers and inequalities like the usual autism seen in other books. It's how a master should write a book, leave his personal thoughts on the subject, thus the book is full of insights, and you can see every concept is related in a hierarchy.

Unlike Rudin's book which is just a list of laundry items, I like Rudin as an exercise/review book but if you read it as the first book you wouldn't see the depth of the subject (unless you read other books lol). Korner and Pugh's book also have great insights, it's a good complement to Tao. Tbh it's kinda silly to learn from one textbook.

>>10610085
unironically this thread prevented me from killing my mother
thanks

>>10610085
picrel is the most elegant in its field

>>10631696
??? explain

>>10631211
Lol

>>10630719
>Dawkins
>>>/reddit/

>>10632545
The Selfish Gene is a good book, Anon. It's Dawkins first and probably his best too.

>>10630719
None of these books are science or math.

>>10632866
>None of these books are science or math.
They kinda are :p

>>10610136
Any advice for someone taking it their second time next sem?

>>10631637
took a glimpse at it, and its absolutely unreadable.
Repeating the word fuck atleast 5 times per line. For the entire book

>>10634338
It was written many years ago by a brilliant unknown author who channeled autism too powerful for one man.

>>10629579
tu

>>10610085
This was a good read

>>10619122
5th edition is way better

>>10635434
I hated this goddamn book. Long-winded explanations and pages and pages that say absolutely nothing

>>10619122
>>10635434
alright lehninger, stop shilling

FBI released 277 pages they said.

>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model

>>10619122
Voet Voet kicks lehninger in its teeth

>>10612426
pawg

>>10610085
This one is a good bridge to real analysis

>>10622928
>>10622948
K&R???

>>10636438
Outdated, shouldn't be used at all.

>>10620275
you mean the Jews.

>>10636438
lolno

>>10622121
It's alright as an introduction and the explicit examples can help make some (obvious) connections. As a main book though, it's a subpar choice.

>>10613109
never have I seen a fish deny so wholeheartedly that it does not have a hook through its cheek...

>>10616739
Not legible

>>10630719
wtf these are all children's book kek

>>10617267
For general biology there isn't a better textbook, for the subjects I mentioned check the wiki but off the top of my head Alberts Microbiology of the Cell, Brock biology of microorganisms, Lewin's Genes (latest edition), Evolutionary Analysis (Herron, Freeman), Ecology (Krebs) and it would be useful to grab a book on organic chemistry and if you get through that Voet's Biochemistry though you could finish the cell bio and microbiology books without ever doing that and just looking shit up that confuses you.

>>10613785
>Hindustan
"no"

>>10637400
>t. the virgin undergrad who can't read his professor's scribbles

>>10616344
memetric self referential functions