[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 59 KB, 600x600, 1soamb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10602642 No.10602642 [Reply] [Original]

What if (You) are simultaneously me except divided by energy self-cockblock called time?

I speculate that after you die you merely resume the existence of someone else who may or may not be living in the same time frame as you today (could be your neighbor you said "hi" to today, could be the anon you called a "faggot" three threads away) the next time you get born, eventually "trying on" (like you would try on pants) all people and all living things. Using another metaphor what I am talking about here is a really pathetic game of musical chairs where a single actor occupies all chairs simultaneously but experiences them in a successive order.

This paradox that I call "split singularity" is unobservable from the right here right now's perspective but from universe's perspective, if it could experience itself, it is sort of a "schizophrenic" circlejerk of energy that keeps quantum-recycling itself faster than a virgin eating their own cum and that cum reabsorbing into their body just to make more cum ad infinitum.

>> No.10602660

I postulate (and philosophically masturbate) that consciousness is one uninterrupted albeit timescale-folded quantum loop spanning consciousnesses of the past, present, and future.

>This is just spinoza, reincarnation, and flawed brainlet dualist crypto-religious "separate consciousness" concept, idiot
It does sound silly but it sounded way cooler in my head. Furthermore, I am unable to translate it into Human, only giving you a sort of rough prototype of the idea lodged far deep in my head. Ah, well, back to flipping burgers at a local mickey D's.

>> No.10602737

>>10602642
Yeah, I've always figured this is how it is.

>> No.10602864

You can't be someone else, brainlet. That would imply being two distinct things. If you are them, you are not you. There is no difference between what you "speculate" and life on earth going on without you in it.

>> No.10603386

>>10602864
>semantics brainlet spotted

>> No.10603390

>>10602642
I speculate that after you fap you merely resume the existence of someone else who may or may not be fapping in the same time frame as you today

>> No.10603484
File: 222 KB, 600x600, 1544483892809.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10603484

>>10602642
If it is self-cockblock we have to assume a strict linear, "I only want to experience penis-based pleasure, meaning my birth story must always be phallic by some measure and be a strict eternal reincarnation penis-only rule."

As in there is homo, hetero, and bi. The one true magic penis is what they share but they all have different stimulation and power preferences, based on how other wielders of their wang interject with their time.

It is easy to experience itself, because I am the center of the experience and I enjoy the Universe describing itself and submitting to my own description for greater beauty and pleasure. The reward is not in the power but in the creation, trouble is the new creation doesn't understand the prior power's morals/ethics because they are a sub-branch of theirs.

>Ichi the Killer

>>10602660
Yes, there is one eye open for each individual (unique soul) and it is watching a mobius strip that gets painted on for eternity while they are not within your field of focus.

>>10602737
Yes, you can be someone else. If you adopt and presume sufficient authority and submit to all inquiries the universe demands, then you must be that person either by default (universal submission) or the creator.

>>10603386
Doesn't actually have enough steps between his first thoughts and his N-th array of thoughts.

>>10603390
An unbroken chain of orgasm is the eternal truth of artistic glory and joy.