/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10597579
There isnt sny study that supports it yet, so you can consider it untrue until then

>Feminists: All men are the same
lol

>>10597591
there are literally dozens of studies that support it

>>10597615
Post one?

>>10597616
Use google scholar and report back friend, if you’ve taken a single science class you should know how to do research online.

>>10597627
>look it up yourself because I am too lazy to support my claim
Never change, /sci/

>>10597636
:)

>>10597636
fuck you nigger faggot

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00096.x

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/123729v1

Gender differences in in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM (Nature, 2018)

>>10597655
>https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/123729v1
>insert figure here
Where are the graphs chinsese-nigger? Need to see a pic that looks like OP

>>10597579
what an meme. a story to tell women so they stop whining about not being professors.
look honey there's more smart men, but also more really dumb men!
o..ok baby that's fair i guess

>>10597733
Really any sort of human interaction will tell you it's true

>>10597728
that’s a preprint you fucking retard

>>10597579
Yeah it's true. It's generally accepted for x-linked traits (hemophilia, colorblindness) and intelligence/cognition is x-linked.
Scientifically there's no doubt, it's only a "controversial" "hypothesis" in gender studies.

>science and math
How are people still arguing this? Are people going out of their way to ignore all the evidence or do they just not bother researching in the first place?

>>10597579
it's true for most of the species because female selects who to reproduce. but not true for homo sapiens because muh political correctness.

>>10598016
>Are people going out of their way to ignore all the evidence or do they just not bother researching in the first place?
well if you'll bring it up you'll be told it's simply due to systemic sexism.

>>10597579
It's obviously empirically true because the majority of eccentric people are males, even and especially in modern society. The reason for that is that males need to push themselves above the average to find a mate in an oversaturated sexual market whereas females do not, and females tend to specifically go out of their way to conform the social norms because they instinctively need a large social group of other females to ensure their own security within the tribe, and being eccentric and unlike them is the fastest way to destroy your positive social standing with that group. This is why every girl pretty much only talks about shallow bullshit like pop culture and avoids logical and extremist topics like the plague, not because she's shallow but because her security depends on her ability to not trigger and offend other people. She still gets the same amount of sexual offers while being mentally average because we males are retarded enough to not care about that, while at the same time maximizing the size of her social circle by not being an edgelord who sticks out

no


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqR4cw9Amlg

>>10598000
so? it doesn't have the evidence
where's the evidence

>>10597579
SInce a definition of "personality traits" is going to be subjective, even more so any measurement of them, I'd say you could prove anything you want depending on how you design your study.