[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 19 KB, 976x549, _106398636_mediaitem106398635.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10540290 No.10540290[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

They REALLY couldn't focus the picture?

>> No.10540297

>>10540290
maybe the black hole didn't want to be focused on

>> No.10540298
File: 53 KB, 625x626, 15462525294140.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10540298

>>10540290
Shitty bait is shitty

>> No.10540301

>focus
You think this was taken from a camera?

>> No.10540313

>>10540301
How many technologies can take pictures?

>> No.10540316

>>10540301
This is bait, but retarded zoomers are complaining about that.

>> No.10540317

>>10540301
If it's not, is it really a picture?

>> No.10540328

>>10540290
>we really were the Dark Souls III™ all along
Really, Nasa?

>> No.10540343

>>10540290
They should have brought in someone with a degree in photography, physicists are always so clumsy when it comes to this stuff.

>> No.10540404
File: 328 KB, 1021x578, Blkhvll.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10540404

>>10540290
here you go bro

>> No.10540488

>>10540290
>focus too much on it
>get sucked in
Fucking retard, we're lucky that the NASA scientists are not as stupid as you are

>> No.10540499

>>10540404
Thanks, fren. Cool digits

>> No.10540507

>>10540290
Well, that was disappointing...

>> No.10540510

It's god.

>> No.10540511

>>10540488
>nasa

>> No.10540514

>>10540290
>"Oh shit, these 4chan hackers have found the 3-day-photoshop-hackjob we wanted to show everyone. Better blur it to oblivion now and publish that instead."

>> No.10540516

>>10540507
Child

>> No.10540537

>>10540290
M87 is 53.49 million light years away dude lol

>> No.10540550

>>10540537
So? What does that have to do with focusing

>> No.10540582
File: 19 KB, 340x201, pluto-before-and-after-data.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10540582

>>10540550
>>10540317
>>10540313
This was the best photo taken of pluto before we did a fly by, and pluto is (technically) in our system, and we can use conventional cameras to photo it.

>> No.10540588

>>10540550
Do you know the physics behind focusing light? Or do you simply know that you press a button on your camera to focus images.

>> No.10540591

>>10540488
>Muh Nasa not Dumb

Let's forget the Columbia disaster happened because your "muh smart nasa scientist" reasoned foam falling several dozen feet wouldn't have damaged a thermal tile because muh foam was virtually weightless lej.

>> No.10540640
File: 30 KB, 225x349, 284475.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10540640

>>10540290
>bilions of dollars spend
>this is the result
How many more crashed satellites and blurry photos until people realise that NASA itself is a black hole for money?

>> No.10540651

>>10540640
Trump should shut them down.

>> No.10540659

>>10540588
I press the screen on my iPhone once and it works perfectly

>> No.10540660

>>10540640
It only cost 28 million from the NSF. It was an international effort so the cost was split across. They used existing telescopes so that saved a bunch of money.

Get off /sci/ trumptard.

>> No.10540664

>>10540640
>nasa

>> No.10540667

They lost the focus technology

>> No.10540670

>>10540290
So what's the real angle of accretion disk, since we see it distorted?

>> No.10540690

>>10540670
It's explained in the conference as our view of it being like top down

>> No.10540698

>>10540690
Thanks, gotta watch this.

>> No.10540714

>>10540516
Why? Because this over hyped photo resulted in an underwhelming revelation?

>> No.10540720

>>10540488
The picture was taken by ESA and completely funded by the EU

>> No.10540725

>>10540714
Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean the revelations are underwhelming.

>> No.10540729

>>10540640
>let's ignore every single innovation Nasa have brought up to the modern world
>lmao let's keep spending more on F-35s

>> No.10540742

>>10540591
No, engineers knew there was damage and requested pictures so proper assessment could be conducted. Management shut it down and decided results from any such assessment wouldn't impact the outcome anyway as there was nothing that could be done to fix the problem before the astronauts would need to return. It was poorly handled and the assessment should have been conducted, but the mistake fell on upper management. Not the engineers or scientists who knew it was a problem but we're not allowed to investigate. Nobody at NASA thought there wasn't any damage, management just decided to hope they might live instead of finding out they were guaranteed death.

>> No.10540757

>>10540725
I understand quite clearly what this means and the efforts behind it.
The image itself is still disappointing.

>> No.10540766

>>10540640
This. Why do you niggers care about space so much? There's literally nothing out there for us.

>> No.10540776

Please give me billions of dollars so I can record some sound waves from a system 1 million light years away

>> No.10540787

>>10540757
>this first ever image of a black hole doesn't have anime tiddys
>I demand a refund

>> No.10540807

>>10540787
>hyperboling for no reason

Child

>> No.10540813

>>10540766
Kill your self with a bulldozer.

>> No.10540824

>>10540729
>>let's ignore every single innovation Nasa have brought up to the modern world

Like what? how has my life changed after these innovations? Asking seriously because I don't know

>> No.10540830

>>10540301
It was taken by a bunch of telescopes and composited