[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 69 KB, 680x680, 4fb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10503359 No.10503359 [Reply] [Original]

hello cesspool of the most retarded people i have ever encountered

i was looking through some nazi ufo stuff and one of the purported anti-gravity machines inside the ufo was shaped like a particle accelerator, apparently they found a submarine with a bunch of mercury in it escaping from germany after the war headed to south america. mercury was been used in ion engines in american aerospace since ww2

is it possible that what people may think is an antigravity machine is really just a particle accelerator which can vent high energy particles out at high speeds.

if particle accelerators can accelerate matter to close to the speed of light, would this not be an excellent form of propulsion for spacecraft?

i have never heard of particle accelerator rings being used in spacecraft before, does anybody know if that have been?

perhaps what people think is antigravity technology is really not, but it has been only been revealed as that so that people will not take it seriously

>> No.10503391

>>10503359
You don't even know what it is you're trying to ask, brainlet

>> No.10503396

>>10503359
A gallon of mercury weighs more than 100 pounds. Think for a second as to why you wouldn't want that as fuel when you got Hydrogen which is like 50 times lighter in liquid form and is probably more likely to combust than Mercury. Also hydrogen is much more efficient per proton. Whereas Mercury has several electrons and can lose a few electrons while Hydrogen can have up to 3, Mercury will still be left with the same amount of the more massive protons.

>> No.10503404

Mercury has unique advantages in the design however this has nothing to do with particle acceleration. The mercury was spun. I'll leave it at that.

>> No.10504568
File: 7 KB, 300x168, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10504568

>>10503404
>I'll leave it at that.

>> No.10504578

>>10503396
>>10503391
I am not saying it was necessarily fuel, i do not know anything about nazi ufo's at all, i do not even know if they exist, i am just asking if anybody has considered or put a particle accelerator ring in a spacecraft to vent out high energy particle beams at close to the speed of light. this seems like it would be a very good design for long distances

>> No.10504943

Read a little bit more about particle accelerators and you'll have your answer, retard

>> No.10504951
File: 42 KB, 720x715, 1553725271909.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10504951

>>10503359
>hello retards
>so i was looking through nazi ufo stuff
How mentally disabled are you? Genuine question

>> No.10504958

>>10504578
That is not my understanding of how the device was intended to function. You seem to be suggestion the device has a second funtion once the AGD loses efficiency. Also that mercury may be critical to both functions.

I just don't see it producing much thrust in an ion-drive like configuration. Then again I could be wrong.

>>10504568
No spoonfeeding.

>> No.10505248

>>>/x/