[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 37 KB, 560x560, 371e11c1-db73-4a33-b85d-26029c238c03_1.66ec6aad49e1ace4ee26f8c60c628d38.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10429213 No.10429213 [Reply] [Original]

What's your scientific calculator of choice?

>> No.10429240

>>10429213
I have a ti-89 titanium I've used since high school, even if it's overkill I like being able to easily go back through my calculations and pull things back out

>> No.10429243
File: 755 KB, 1550x1900, casio-fx-991ex.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10429243

>>10429213

>> No.10429245
File: 2.03 MB, 2340x4160, IMG_20190302_142142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10429245

Casio has been heavily promoted over at our school. I have a Casio fx-300ES PLUS since its allowed in the contests I join. I would like to have their Classwiz Series tho (the black and white calculator). Our school has those classwiz calculators for borrowers. I like mine so far since it fits well in my bag and its enough for my daily use. Though I owned a Sharp brand before (forgot the model).

>> No.10429246

>computing utensils
not science or math

>> No.10429254

>>10429243
>4x4 matrix
Fuck, I need one of those.

>> No.10429260

>>10429245
this is what I have. good calculator for 12 bucks

>> No.10429269

>>10429260
>no numerical differentiation or integration
>good

>> No.10429271

>>10429269
>for 12 bucks

>> No.10429282

May not be the best, but damn does it work well

>> No.10429313
File: 351 KB, 2496x1010, F-C_2-83N.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10429313

>> No.10430022
File: 90 KB, 800x1067, ti-nspire-cx-cas_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10430022

>>10429213
All you need

>> No.10430046

Anyone know what the Casio letter suffixes mean? Shopping around for a new calculator.

>> No.10430060

>>10429271
The one in the OP can be had for like 18 and does numerical differentiation and integration

>Casio cucks on suicide watch

>> No.10430064

>>10429213
You posted it

>> No.10430090

>>10429245
>>10429243
absolutely based and casiopilled

>> No.10430104

>>10430022
why can't a smart phone do all this?

>> No.10430110

>>10430104
I don't know. I want to know

re: OP
Casio FX82AU PLUS II

>> No.10430115

>>10429240
What the fuck? Who spends $200 on a calculator for high school?

>> No.10430121

>>10430060
nothing beats the price of free i guess

>> No.10430122

>>10429243
The other fatal flaw is much easier to explain. Simply put, it only remembers the answer to the most recent equation. There's no ability to scroll up to previous entries, and if your calculator times out and goes to sleep, it'll clear its memory.
It's something so simple that I've relied on for so long, that I'm not sure I'm willing to give it up.

>> No.10430125

>>10430022
>doesn't understand what a scientific calculator is.

>> No.10430132

>>10429213
best scientific calculator

intuitive
built in quadratic and third power equation solver.
does 3x3 matrices
can do definite integrals and derivatives
can store seven variables
can scroll through previous answers
keeps memory until cleared manually
$20 and under
acceptable on nearly all tests

>> No.10430162

>>10429213
a pirated version of mathematica which somehow lets me do as many wolfram alpha queries as I've needed so far (included the step by step solver)
wolfram plz no bully

>> No.10430168

>>10430115
North American high school math teachers are incapable of teaching students to plot elementary functions without using a calculator to do all the work, so a TI-83, -84, or -89 is usually what schools recommend.

It's all a huge scam, but when your parents never had them and you're a teenager who doesn't know the difference, you buy it anyway and never use it after you graduate high school.

>>10430022
>excessive number of unnecessary features
>inconvenient user interface
>high cost
>poor battery life
>not a scientific calculator
>not allowed in exams
Wow, sounds great.

>>10430132
I love it. I wish the processor was a bit faster though, especially for the equation solver. I also wish you could enter values directly into the vector and matrix functions instead of having to edit the values separately.

>> No.10430177

>>10430168
>It's all a huge scam, but when your parents never had them and you're a teenager who doesn't know the difference, you buy it anyway and never use it after you graduate high school.
Are they in some kind of shady cartel with Texas Instruments?

>> No.10430201

>>10430104
You can't use phones at exams
You can use programmable calculators with non-qwerty keyboards
CAS is an excellent feature for later studies
Nspire also has a limited mode for exams the teacher can check and switch on, so still allowed.

>> No.10430203

>>10430168
>high cost
I got mine with CAS for $45, ebay is full with them

>> No.10430254

The thinking man's combination: Mathematica and >>10429243

>> No.10430256

>>10430254
Good luck using laptop at the exam

>> No.10430260

>>10430256
Anon...

>> No.10430384
File: 54 KB, 732x456, calc_rules_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10430384

Brainlet here. I have a maths exam coming up (nothing too crazy, not sure where to place it compared to US Calc I/II standards) and I'd feel much more comfortable in it if I could quickly generate graphs.

The calculatpr rules are that it must be a non-programmable "scientific calculator", with additional restrictions in pic related. These are obviously intended to rule out anything resembling a traditional graphing calculator. But I noticed that, strictly speaking, they don't forbid the ability to simply auto-draw a graph (as long as it can't then differentiate/integrate it for me).

Are there any calculators that can render a graph for me but do not offer any calculus features? I couldn't find any with a quick look on Amazon.

>> No.10430387

>>10430256
It's okay anon, we love you even if you're not smart~!<3

>> No.10431022

>>10430122
>Simply put, it only remembers the answer to the most recent equation

>Answer Memory (Ans) X
>Previous Answer Memory (Pre Ans) X
>Variables 9

Dead wrong.

>There's no ability to scroll up to previous entries

You just hit the up/down keys. You can change to display to multi-line as well to see them.

>and if your calculator times out and goes to sleep, it'll clear its memory.

Some schools require this.

>> No.10431055
File: 344 KB, 1079x1397, module-fx-cg500 prizm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10431055

>>10430022
>large touch screen >>> messy button layout
>faster

>> No.10431062

>>10429245
Based taste

>> No.10431078

>>10430046
They're just the revision numbers: S -> W -> MS -> ES -> ES Plus -> EX

115/991 is the solar powered full version
570 is the AAA powered full version
82/350/300 is the stripped down version

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casio_V.P.A.M._calculators#List_of_calculators

>> No.10431089

>>10430115
The same idiots that go with the crowd and buy Ti. "What if the cheaper version doesn't have something I need? I'll just get what everyone is getting to be safe."

>> No.10431109

Anons were given Casio, but they were, all of them, deceived, for another Calculator was made. In the land of HP, in the fires of Mount CAS, the Dark Company forged in secret a master Calculator, to control all others. And into this Calculator he poured his cruelty, his malice and his Reverse Polish Notation. "HP 50 to rule them all."

>> No.10431153

>>10430060
So do Casio's.

>>10430132
>intuitive
Debatable.
>built in quadratic and third power equation solver.
Casio can solve up to fourth power equations.
>does 3x3 matrices
Casio does 4x4s
>can do definite integrals and derivatives
Same but faster on a Casio.
>can store seven variables
Casio does 9.
>can scroll through previous answers
Same.
>keeps memory until cleared manually
This isn't really a big problem.
>$20 and under
Same.
>acceptable on nearly all tests
Same.

>>10430168
>North American high school math teachers are incapable of teaching students to plot elementary functions without using a calculator to do all the work, so a TI-83, -84, or -89 is usually what schools recommend.
I heard many schools have switched to over to Desmos.

>>10430177
Yes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoGl8-Wc-L0

>> No.10431185

>>10430384
Casio FX-300ES Plus has a table mode where you can enter 1 or 2 functions and it will evaluate them at a bunch of points. You can then easily plot few points on paper to see a graph or just infer from the table what you were looking for (zeros, maximums, etc).

I'll email them and ask if differentiation/integration refers to just symbolic or if numerical forbidden as well. And ask about baked in scientific constants whether they count or not as retrievable information.

>> No.10431417

>>10429313
Fuck yeah. I own one of these and its the best thing ever.

>> No.10431536

>>10430022
HP Prime is better and cheaper

>> No.10431577

>>10430384
Doesn't that say it can be programmable as long as it doesn't have a full keyboard? I don't see why a standard graphing calculator (with the memory cleared) would be prohibited.

>> No.10431585

>>10431417
Nice, my parents gave me one for my 19th birthday. Did you get yours new old stock from Faber?

>> No.10431604

>>10431577
Pretty much every graphing calculator will tell you the slope of a graph. And if they allowed graphing calculators, they would mentioned it.

>> No.10431611

>>10429213
*is the best calculator that's allowed for the PE exam in your path*

>> No.10431632

>>10431185
Thanks

>>10431577
"Type Z" (programmable) isn't allowed for my exam, only the highlighted "Type Y" (scientific). Also what >>10431604 said

>> No.10431679

>>10431604
Numerically finding the slope of a graph isn't the same as differentiating it. What kid of "programmable calculator" do you think they're referring to? No one has made fully programmable non-graphing calculators since the 80s.

>> No.10431686

>>10430022
This thing sounds like a typewritter during tests

>> No.10431748

Hp48 G

>> No.10431751

RPN is cancer

>> No.10431769

>>10431679
>What kid of "programmable calculator" do you think they're referring to? No one has made fully programmable non-graphing calculators since the 80s.
They're still around and go for $40~50:
https://www.amazon.com/Japanese-Program-Functional-Calculator-FX-5800P-N/dp/B000NWJI6C
https://www.amazon.com/FX-3650PII-Programmable-Calculators-functions-FX3650P/dp/B00J58V5KW
https://www.amazon.com/HP-35S-Programmable-Scientific-Calculator/dp/B004A0XHH4/

>> No.10431787
File: 1.63 MB, 500x281, 1551099235453.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10431787

>>10431679
>Numerically finding the slope of a graph isn't the same as differentiating it

Spotted the CS major.

>> No.10431804

>>10431787
I'm a mechanical engineer

>> No.10431818

>>10431804
No you're not, code monkey.

>> No.10431853

>>10431751
Brainlet spotted.

>> No.10431898

>>10431611
>*is the best calculator that's allowed for the PE exam in your path*
>https://ncees.org/exams/calculator/
Which is the 991EX

>> No.10432216

>>10431089
>people who can afford to spend more for nicer things are idiots
Not everyone is sworn to a life of frugality and suffering.

>> No.10432364

>>10432216
>Not everyone is sworn to a life of frugality and suffering.
You say that like it's a good thing.

>> No.10432369

>>10432364
It is if you like technology and innovation more than bible studies and communism

>> No.10432428
File: 68 KB, 700x700, 09-roll-safe.w700.h700.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10432428

>>10429213
Right here.

>> No.10432444

>>10432369
>bible studies and communism
Why did you say "and" and not "or"? Use the right language.

>> No.10432452

>>10432444
So you could feel smarter proof reading for me

>> No.10432678
File: 449 KB, 1280x1032, diogenes-and-alexander 1551270295547.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10432678

>>10432216
>Not everyone is sworn to a life of frugality and suffering.
Worked for Diogenes

>> No.10432681

>>10429213
/thread

>> No.10432839

HP48GX
God Tier Calulator

PAID 500 FOR THE Calc AND 128mb ram card in the early 1990s

>> No.10432959

>>10432369
>if you like technology and innovation more than bible studies
You say that like they're mutually exclusive.

>> No.10433648
File: 117 KB, 640x360, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10433648

>>10429213

>> No.10433786

>>10430384
What does it mean by algebraic manipulation? That can literally be used to exclude any calculator.

>> No.10433813

>>10431185
300ES literally markets itself as having Very Precise Algebraic Manipulation.

>> No.10433960

>>10429213
I broke one of mine and the other one literally died on me. I don't need a scientific calculator anymore but I loved this calculator when I had it.

>> No.10434006

>>10429243
yep, proud owner

>> No.10434024

i have a TI-89 but the TI-83 is still my favorite.

>> No.10434040

are u allowed to use programmable calculators at exams?

>> No.10434049

>>10433648
That's wack, mine dosen't work

>> No.10434335

>>10433813
Bait?
>Casio V.P.A.M. calculators are scientific calculators made by Casio which use Casio's Visually Perfect Algebraic Method (V.P.A.M.), Natural Display or Natural V.P.A.M. input methods.
>V.P.A.M. is an infix system for entering mathematical expressions, used by Casio in most of its current scientific calculators. In the infix notation the precedence of mathematical operators is taken into account. According to Casio, in V.P.A.M. calculations can be input exactly as they are normally written. Functions, operators and symbols are shown on the calculator display and calculations are performed according to operator precedence.
It just means it "prettyprints" things
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prettyprint

>> No.10435271

>>10433786
Computer Algebra Systems, particularly symbolic mathematics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_algebra_system

>> No.10435281

>>10429213
I got a TI84+

>> No.10435313

>>10429213

iPad Pro

>> No.10435542

>>10435281
A Ti 83+ is literally faster

>> No.10435618

>>10430168
I've been using my ti-84 for everything, mostly unrelated to graphing at this point. Obviously, you've never explored the functionality in an 84.

>> No.10436060

>all these brainlet normies buying ti

>> No.10436069

>>10436060
yeah man gotta suck to be them could you imagine owning a graphing calculator which a lot of other people are also using, and have used for well over a decade? pants on head retarded

>> No.10436083

>>10430177
mfw I fell for this meme
*shrug* at least I can sell, or possibly even use to evaluate integrals on a GRE... but I guess there's Mathematica and such for that

>> No.10436105

>>10436069
Imagine paying hundreds of dollars for a piece of technology that was obsolete fifteen years ago.

>> No.10436107

>>10436069
>could you imagine owning a graphing calculator which a lot of other people are also using, and have used for well over a decade? pants on head retarded
Bait or are you totally oblivious how bad of a reason that is for buying something?
>could you imagine owning lead pipes/cookware which a lot of other people are also using, and have used for well over a decade?
>could you imagine owning asbestos home insulation which a lot of other people are also using, and have used for well over a decade?
>could you imagine owning a landline telephone which a lot of other people are also using, and have used for well over a century?
>could you imagine owning a horse which a lot of other people are also using, and have used for well over a century?
>could you imagine owning an abacus which a lot of other people are also using, and have used for well over a millennia?

>> No.10436109
File: 210 KB, 500x280, 1544588729950.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10436109

>>10429213
pencil and paper

>> No.10436175

>>10429246
that is literally both science and math you tard

>> No.10436183

>>10430384
you're most likely not going to find a calculator dumb enough to not have an algebra solver nor be programmable and be able to plot a graph. most likely the best calculator you can have is the same best one im allowed to use in my calculus class, the ti-30xs multiview
>>10433786
that means it cant have a number solver feature like the ti-36

>> No.10436189

>>10436105
Do you know what obsolete means?

>>10436107
Show me on the doll where the ti calculator touched you

>> No.10436229

HP 50G. Cause the HP 48 finally died.

>> No.10436269

>>10436105
>2004 was 15 years ago

Fucking hell, I feel old.

>> No.10436275
File: 44 KB, 189x129, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10436275

>>10436189

>> No.10436278

>>10436269
>In the United States, the TI-89 is allowed by the College Board on all calculator-permitted tests, including the SAT, some SAT Subject Tests, and the AP Calculus, Physics, Chemistry, and Statistics exams.

As far as I'm aware the ti89 titanium is also still produced. It's certainly old tech but not obsolete.

>> No.10436295

>>10436278
don't (You) me

Also >>10431055 exists being faster, more capable, has more memory, larger hi-res color touch screen, and cheaper to boot

>> No.10436309

>>10436295
Yeah my calculator has worked for 13 years so far, if the day comes when I need something more capable your calculator will probably be "obsolete", too. Smart phones are more powerful and of course a computer even more so. Doesn't suddenly mean older computational devices are invalidated.

>> No.10436330
File: 2.78 MB, 640x360, 1463001985159.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10436330

>>10436309
>Doesn't suddenly mean older computational devices are invalidated
Dat cope

>> No.10436337

>TI-30Xa

We're not allowed to use graphing calculators on tests.

>> No.10436340

>>10436330
Firstly, are you certain it's invalidated? And second, that is clearly not a handheld calculator.

>> No.10436381

>>10436309
Obsolete doesn't mean useless. The real problem with TI graphing calculators isn't that the technology is old, it's that the cost is excessive compared to the value of the product.

>> No.10436407

>Ti 36X Pro
>$22.55-27
>Casio FX-115ES Plus
>$16-17

>Ti 83
>$95
>Casio fx-9750GII
>$46

>Ti 84 plus
>$129
>Casio fx-9860GII
>$80

>Ti 84 plus CE
>$135-160
>Casio fx-CG50
>$94

>Ti 89 Titanium
>$140-145
>TI-Nspire CX
>$150-170
>Casio fx-CG500
>$130

>> No.10436568

>>10436105
>not knowing the used market exists
Guess who's the brainlet here?

>> No.10436571

>>10436407
You forgot
>Ti Nspire CX CAS
>used
>$45

>> No.10436621

tips for repairing a graphing calculator? I've got a row of dead buttons after it banged around in my suitcase and have never soldered before

>> No.10436785

Why America's universities allows students to use CAS calculators on exams?

>> No.10436911

>>10436785
"ITS OK IF YOU SHOW YOUR WORK BRO"

>> No.10436928

If you weren't born using the abacus then just use the Trachtenberg system for basic calculations, works like a charm even for me who can't build muscle. I could beat easily my teachers at calculations when I was a kid without any real training. They were such a bunch of brainlets

>> No.10437300

>>10436568
>>10436571
>used goods
ew

>> No.10437780

>>10436928
wow arnt you just an autistic fuck head

>> No.10437794

>>10437780
I bet you need more than 1 whole minute to multiply two 5-digit numbers together.

>> No.10438498
File: 262 KB, 800x691, 1426760103042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10438498

I prefer to use loli neets

>> No.10438564

>>10436381
This. If you know your way around any calculator well, stick with it. You'll be way faster than if you have to fumble through endless menus to get to the function you want. At that point, you're better off just plugging it into a search engine. The calculators are simply for convenience and efficiency of input.

>> No.10438572

>>10436381
Obsolete means no longer produced or used; out of date. Neither of which apply to a calculator that's still both produced, and used.

>> No.10438583

>>10430132
I had a calculus II professor that insisted that all scientific calculators that allowed you to use the button that would solve a definite integral be discarded for the test

I was kinda hilarious to see all the kids who bought the calculator for the class get cucked while I was lucky enough to use the white and blue version that didn't have that feature

>> No.10438704

>>10438583
Why would you be allowed calculators in a calculus class?

>> No.10438712

>>10438572
Why the fuck are you defending a massive corporation conning children into spending hundreds of dollars on inferior technology?

>> No.10439429

>>10438572
So are abacuses

>> No.10439440

>>10439429
Yeah, that's realistic, I can imagine someone like you bringing one to a college board exam

>> No.10439863
File: 28 KB, 432x329, Slide_Rule.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10439863

>>10429213

You Whipper Snappers have no idea how to properly calculate.

>> No.10440372

>>10439863
you tell me

>> No.10441707

>>10439863
You call that a slide rule? This >>10429313 is a slide rule.