[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 74 KB, 1000x998, 9-types-of-intelligence-infographic.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425501 No.10425501 [Reply] [Original]

Ok, IQ tests are only for logical-mathematical. But how I test my other intelligences?

>> No.10425508

>>10425501
There's only one intelligence which is best measured by IQ.

>> No.10425510

IQ tests also do verbal

emotional intelligence is a leftist meme

there are other aspects of intelligence but they almost always have high correlation with pattern seeing ability and logic which is measured by IQ

>> No.10425523

>>10425508
>implying Einstein could write Hamlet or Shakespeare could formulate the relativity.

>> No.10425533
File: 269 KB, 1000x998, 1551392182745.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425533

>>10425501
>>10425510
This teacher once gave a lecture how her fucking stupid sister has a high EQ and I seriously had to contain my laughter.

>> No.10425536

>>10425508
>implying Messi could compose the Ninth Symphony
>implying Napoleon could play guitar like Hendrix

>> No.10425545

>>10425536
>>10425523

Environmental factors.

>> No.10425556

>>10425523
>>10425536
Neither Shakespeare, Messi, or Hendrix were really smart though?

>> No.10425573

>>10425501
The other intelligences were made up to make stupid people look good.

>> No.10425577

>>10425556
Right. Genius is a better word to define them.

>> No.10425593

>>10425545
No?

>> No.10425639

>>10425501
These aren't intelligence. They're completely different things most of which can't be called a type of intelligence. There's no category for these, they have nothing in common.

>> No.10425747
File: 165 KB, 2640x2200, so.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425747

>>10425501
Do things in real life that matter...

>> No.10425755

>>10425501
PIQ is not FSIQ ("IQ"), it also includes VIQ.

>> No.10425769

>>10425523
>implying Einstein could write Hamlet
>implying Einstein could make a rip-off Greek Tragedy, like he did with his Theory of Relativity

Einstein can totally do that, you brainlet

>> No.10425770

>IQ is only logical-mathematical
Incorrect. In fact, if you took a correlation matrix of all of the "types" of intelligence in your picture, you could factor analyze them and find a single factor ('g' in research) which can be regarded as the underlying mechanism for all of them, and it is this factor which is referred to as general intelligence. General intelligence, measured by g-loaded IQ tests, literally predicts all of the types of intelligence depicted here. Therefore, you test all intelligence by taking a g-loaded IQ test, such as a Raven's progressive matrix test.

>> No.10425784

>>10425770
raven's doesn't really do a great job of gauging mathematical or verbal abilities and isn't as g-loaded as like a concept matching test

>> No.10425799

>>10425510
>emotional intelligence is a leftist meme
He said, probably having been diagnosed with autism. You have to be genuinely retarded to think that a high IQ correlates positively with your ability to understand other human beings. If anything, it's the opposite.

>> No.10425819

>>10425755
Well, that's how the WAIS categorizes things. The Stanford-Binet doesn't, for example.

>> No.10425824

>>10425799
I don't think its definitively either, rather different IQs would have more mutual problems with each other, but it functions a lot like your point in groups with clear average IQ

>> No.10425826
File: 46 KB, 467x546, g-loading.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10425826

>>10425770
Furthermore, the most g-loaded subtests are verbal in nature. Vocabulary, Similarities and Information (trivia) all correlate more with g than "culture-fair" subtests like matrix problems, block design or digit span.

>> No.10425859

>>10425819
WAIS is the favored IQ test though?

>> No.10425861

>>10425826
Neat, didn't know that.

>> No.10425866

>>10425859
Is it now? Either way I posted that because I wanted to point out that "FSIQ" isn't a general psychometric concept in the way g factor is.

>> No.10425871

>>10425866
Excerpt:
>The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) is the most commonly used adult IQ test for measuring intelligence.
Source:
>https://wechsleriqtest.com/wechsler-adult-intelligence-scale/
And I don't see what they'd gain by lying, as it would discredit them amongst psychometricians.

>> No.10426985

>>10425556
Messi has a high bodily-kinesthetic intelligence, Shakespeare had a high linguistic intelligence and Hendrix had a high musical inteligence.

>> No.10428462

>>10426985
Excuse me, but it's not intelligence unless it's linked to pattern recognition in an online IQ test.

>> No.10428474
File: 119 KB, 583x482, 1548672444364.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10428474

>another IQ thread

>> No.10428483

>>10428474
based

>> No.10428485

>>10428474
thank you for your sirpiss

>> No.10428544

>>10425501
IQ tests are good to measure your IQ, not necessarily your intelligence. What even is intelligence?

>> No.10428906

>>10425501
Other "intelligences" are just liberals trying to justify being a dumbass with skills. Playing an instrument is not musical intelligence, it is a developed skill. Here's the difference, a smart person can use his intelligence to best learn how to play an instrument, learn a sport, develop his emotional empathy, etc. A "musically intelligent" person can't sing their way through math class, philosophy, awareness, etc.

>> No.10428949

>>10428906
>Playing an instrument is not musical intelligence, it is a developed skill
Mozart sure had the ripe musical development years of toddlerhood to compose at the age of 5
>A "musically intelligent" person can't sing their way through math class, philosophy, awareness, etc.
>durr there is only one type of intelligence durr fucking liberals

>> No.10431083 [DELETED] 

>>10425799
A high IQ helps you relate to White and Asian men, which are the intelligent members of the human species who invented everything you see around you. Men don’t care about this Freudian “emotional intelligence” nonsense. That’s entirely garbage to prop up women, who don’t belong in matters of men and are little more than overgrown children. Shitskins are pretty much zoo animals when it comes to intellect, so they’re irrelevant in this realm as well.

>> No.10431170

>>10428949
Composing music is a feat of intelligence, playing an instrument is monkey tier shit. I also mean composing music from scratch but slicing up music like what most DJs do nowadays.The way I see it intelligence is based on how complex the original information your brain outputs can be.

So a guy who can write a novel in a couple of hours is smart. A guy who can create a complex math problem then solve it is also smart. A guy who can compose a musical song from scratch is also smart.

>> No.10431236

>>10425536
talent=/=intelligence

>> No.10431277

>>10428474
based "another IQ thread" poster!

>> No.10431286

>>10425523
>durr einstein couldn't even write a whole play i mean just look at all those words
retard

>> No.10431288

>>10428906
>anon faces off against Tyson
>"I am sure to win because my intelligence is superior"

>> No.10431292

>>10431170
Oh okay i see, you’re actually retarded.

>> No.10431296
File: 214 KB, 539x675, 1542772251297.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10431296

>>10425510
>emotional intelligence is a leftist meme
>kills mom because he failed his classes
These red pilled geniuses just keep on trucking it uh?