/sci/ - Science & Math

sneed

>people that coddle the reader by telling him the proof has finished

>people that indicate vectors by drawing a squiggly line underneath the letter

I personally end them with "as desired"

>>10414547
>ending your proof with quantum electrodynamics

>>10414594
I personally want to end your life

>>10414549
this

>people that call it Bernoulli's rule instead of L'Hospital's

>>10414547
>telling people that the proof is complete

>people that indicate derivatives by putting dots over their functions
Inb4 Newton, it's still clunky as fuck

>people that sneed their feed isnead of chuck their fuck

>>10414857
>L'Hospital's
So close and yet so far

>>10414547
>students that end an assignment question asking them to [math]verify[/math] Stokes's theorem with "QED"

>>10414888
Based

>>10414888
>people who get trips
Based

>>10414547
>statement of the theorem and the actual proof are separated by 3 pages of commentary

>>10414908
[math]\int_{\partial \Omega}\omega=\int_\Omega d\omega \\
\color{red}Q\color{orange}.\color{yellow}E\color{teal}.\color{blue}D\color{violet}. [/math]

>>10414547
>using a kike symbol instead of the white mans QED

>>10415084
Don't you dare shit on Halmos. That man was a treasure.

>plebs who don't end a proof by contradiction with a bolt arrow

>>10415114

holy shit how can you be this based

>>10415106
he was a piece of shit kike. math belongs to the white man

>>10414885
You have to do this in astronomy if you're derivating by time

>>10414549

based

>>10415204
Not realising ein(((stein))) is a kike

>>10414547
If you think you can end every proof with QED you don't understand QED.

>not ending your proof with BAZINGA

>>10414885
Derivatives with respect to arclength are dots, with respect to any other parameters are primes

>>10414547
Why would someone end their proofs with Feynman diagrams?

>>10414547
>he doesn't leave the proof to the reader

>>10414905
>people that call it L'Hôpital's rule

>>10414547
I do both, I put QED then a little box