/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10397719

>>10397731
>What are operations other than the standard operations?

36

>>10397719
are you supposed to add the digits of the two-digit numbers? in that case
“33” * “33” = 6*6 = 36

>>10397738
Unless otherwise stated, standard is assumed.

>>10397719
64, obviously.

>>10397719

>>10397719
[math]
11*11 \equiv 4 \pmod{117}\\
22*22 \equiv 16 \pmod{117}\\
33*33 \equiv 36 \pmod{117}\\
[/math]

>>10397755

>>10397719
64

256

>>10397777
Quads don't lie

>>10397719
36
This place really is just filled to the brim with retards nowadays isnt it?

>>10397719
8 minuets per hour

>>10397757
Why would i want to prove it wrong? 7x7=49
7+42=49
I dont see a problem here.

>>10397757
(-6)×(-7)=42 fgt

11*11=4
11+11=22
22x22=16
4^2=16
22+11=33
16^2=256
33+11=44
256^2=65536

>>10397719
4^3 is 64

>>10397719
11x11 = 121, sum of digits = 4
22x22 = 484, sum of digits = 16
33x33 = 1089, sum of digits = 18

? = 18

>>10397719
4 = 4^1
16 = 4^2
64 = 4^3

Stop overthinking easy patterns just because they threw you some diversion symbols on the left.

64. Your question does not supply enough information to suggest any one answer. Just yo make sense of it

>>10397741
>>10397812
>>10397840

You know it's a bad problem when there are several answers that can't be proven wrong

>>10397864
There's an infinite number of solutions for all of these pattern recognition puzzles

ITT another nonsense IQ test question where clearly there is no real correct answer but instead some psychologist picked out his favorite as the right answer, therefore /sci/ gets super triggered since IQ is our most hallowed meme

>>10397864
Only >>10397812 actually makes sense.

>>10397719
for sake of being different
1+1+1+1 = 4 x 1 ( the number used to add)
2+2+2+2 = 8 x 2 (16)
3+3+3+3 = 12 x 3 (36)

>>10397719
You're just doing multiplication mod 117. The answer is 36.

>>10397759
This

81

>>10397719
>>10397871
i thought it was like pre-digitized number systems where you add all the symbols (for example XXI = 10 + 10 + 1). so i just did that

11*11 = 4 -> (1 + 1) * (1 + 1)
22*22 = 16 -> (2 + 2) * (2 + 2)
33*33 = 36 -> (3 + 3) * (3 + 3)

so the answer i got was 36

>>10397900
funny causy i used same thing but i timed the numbers instead of adding here >>10397889
2x2 = 4 but also 2+2 = 4
anything after that breaks the pattern

>OP:"what's 1+1?"
>kindergarter:"2"
>OP:"NO! ITS 11!!! HAHAHAHAHAH WHAT A IQ BRAINLET!!!! IMAO I AM SO MUCH SMARTER THAN EVERYBODY!!! IMAGINE BEING THIS MUCH OF A NUMALE!!! OMG!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!"

>>10397916
>t. I'm the 99%

>>10397916
t. Trolled

>>10397719
there are two or more answers for this pattern
you need to give the answer to 33x33 and let us find the answer for 44x44

11x11=4
33x33=?

x=4/121
33(4/121)33=?

?=36

>>10397719
81

>>10397719
this is easy peasy lmn squesy
im from serbia and i can solve this look:
it 387420489

since 11x11 is 4 that means that 1 1 1 1 = 4 witch is 1+1 + 1+1 =4
since 22x22 is 16 that means that 2 2 2 2 = 16 witch is 2*2 * 2*2 = 16
since 33x33 is ? tat means that 3 3 3 3 = 16 witch is 3*3 ^ 3*3 = 387420489

bcuz we go from + for 1st digree operacion and then its * for 2th oper. so that means that 3th is just ^ swith

>>10397933
>Everyone who doesn't give my preferred answer to my poorly constructed and extremely vague problem is a brainlet

>>10397719
assuming that "x" is homogen, we get from
11x11 = 4:
22 x 22 = 2^2 (11x11) = 4(4) = 16
33 x 33 = 3^2 (11x11) = 9(4) = 36

>>10397731
wrong
>>10397738
wrong
>>10397741
wrong
>>10397742
wrong
>>10397753
wrong
>>10397755
wrong
>>10397757
wrong
>>10397759
wrong
>>10397776
wrong
>>10397777
wrong
>>10397779
wrong
>>10397780
wrong
>>10397781
wrong
>>10397785
wrong
>>10397789
wrong
>>10397791
wrong
>>10397802
wrong
>>10397807
wrong
>>10397812
wrong
>>10397840
wrong
>>10397847
wrong
>>10397864
wrong
>>10397865
wrong
>>10397868
wrong
>>10397871
wrong
>>10397873
wrong
>>10397883
wrong
>>10397887
wrong
>>10397889
wrong
>>10397900
wrong
>>10397908
wrong
>>10397916
wrong
>>10397933
wrong
>>10397935
wrong
>>10397970
wrong
>>10397987
wrong
>>10398010
wrong
>>10398027
corect
>>10398028
wrong
>>10398030
wrong

>>10398046
>look mom! I quoted everyone! Now they will finally like me!

>>10398046
>He actually replied
Lmaoooooooooo look at this fag

>>10397731
wrong
>>10397738
wrong
>>10397741
wrong
wrong
>>10397759
wrong
>>10397776
wrong
>>10397777
wrong>>10397731
wrong
>>10397738
wrong
>>10397741
wrong
>>10397742
wrong
>>10397753
wrong
>>10397755
wrong
>>10397757
wrong
>>10397759
wrong
>>10397779
wrong
>>10397780
wrong>>10397731
wrong
>>10397738
wrong
>>10397741
wrong
>>10397742
wrong
>>10397753
wrong
>>10397755
wrong
>>10397757
wrong
>>10397759
wrong
>>10397776
wrong
>>10397777
wrong
>>10397779
wrong
>>10397780
wrong
>>10397781
wrong cant wait to get banned lmao
>>10397785
wrong
>>10397789
wrong
>>10397791
wrong
>>10397802
wrong

>>10397987
wrong
>>10398010
wrong
>>10398027 (You)
corect
>>10398028
wrong
>>10398030
wrong
>>10398064
wrong
>>10398065
wrong
>>10397781
wrong
>>10397785
wrong
>>10397789
wrong
wrong
>>10397935
wrong
>>10397970
wrong
>>10397987
wrong

>>10398065
wrong

>>10398076
>>10398046
OP here, this dude isn't me

>>10398079
IT'S MA'AM
>>10398079
wrong
>>10398079
wrong
>>10398079
wrong
>>10398079
wrong
>>10398079
wrong
>>10398079
wrong

1+1+1+1 = 4
2*2*2*2 = 16
3^3^3^3 = Inf

69

>>10398046
>>10398076
>>10398084
>IT'S MA'AM

is this ur time of the month femanon?

>>10397731
Its just omitting symbols
1x1x1x1=4
2x2x2x2=16
3x3x3x3=81

>>10398138
No they dilate every day, so every day is technically their time of the month. Actually, it's their time of the month about 3 times per day. And fuck you for assuming it's a woman only because it wants to be called "ma'am"

>>10398140
>1x1x1x1=4

>>10398145
>it wants to be called "ma'am"
am sorry i forgot was supposed to treat it as property

36

>>10397812
44x44 = 19

>>10398027
Okay whats 44 x 44 brainlet?

>>10397719
>tfw instantly thought it was 36
>then realize it's some complex shit again
why do I keep punishing myself with coming here bros?

It's 36

11 x 11 = (1+1) x (1+1) = 4
22 x 22 = (2+2)x(2+2) = 16
33 x 33 = (3+3)x(3+3) = 36

>>10397719
I can't believe that I thought I was so clever coming up with these kinds of silly "puzzles". Now I hate them because the major problem with these "puzzles" is that any pattern can be justified due to how vauge the terms are defined.

>>10397731 is the only answer that should be seriously considered.

>>10397719
64

>>10398489
>>10398517
Do people really think there is a correct answer? I mean this is pretty basic high school/lower level undergraduate math. There's no "correct" answer because there's plenty of functions f: ZxZ -> Z such that f(11, 11) = 4, f(22, 22) = 16, and f(33, 33):Z. In fact there is a uncountably infinite number of such functions.

Some common recursively definable ones would yield f(33, 33) = 28, f(33, 33) = 36, f(33, 33) = 4, f(33, 33) = 64, f(33, 33) = 128. Etc.

Honestly, you shouldn't even be on a "science and math forum", even one as brainlet-tier as /sci/ if you need any of this explained to you. This isn't even really shit that anyone every sits down and tells you in a math class. It just stuff that any generally intelligent person with even a passing interest in math should be able to realize if they put any time into actually thinking about it.

>>10397719
256

Done
2^(1+1) = 4
4^(2+2)= 16
16^(3+3) = 16777216

>>10398140
>1x1x1x1=4

oh i finaly got it
(1+1) * (1+1) = 4
(2+2) * (2+2) = 16
(3+3) * (3+3) = 36

>>10397719
32

>>10397719
64

>>10397865
yeah
usually however, there's a clear simplest one. in this case, there are at least two reasonable solutions
usually also questions like this have multiple choices for exactly the same reason

>>10397759
wow. so there is a possible actual maths answer beyond 'add the digits'.

>>10398648
Well you overestimate maths education for us old folks. I did O Level (UK, take them at 16 y.o.a.) in 1978, and covered algebra and calculus but that was it. I have absolutely no idea what you mean by functions or what you wrote after that. And I've had no 'passing interest in math' (sorry but ROTFL) since. I sometimes wonder if there is anything in it but would rather learn music, history, just about anything else, really.

[math]a \times b = frac{85 a^2 b^2 - 9457 a b}{25047}[/math]
So 33x33 = 90504612/25047 = 3613.3913

>>10398818
I meant
a x b = (85 a^2 b^2 - 9457 a b)/25047

>>10397812
OP is retarded, this is a valid answer given the information even if it's not the one he had in mind.

>>10397719
I think the answer is 64. Here's my reasoning:
I ignored the left column and focused on the right. When 11*11, the answer is 4. When 22*22, the answer is 16. 4^1=4; 4^2=16; 4^3=64. I'm probably wrong for ignoring the left but it was worth a try.

>>10397719
24

straight lines are worth 1
curves are worth 3

>>10397719
(11x11) + (22x22) = (33x33) = 20

There can be any answer as long as it satisfies a pattern.

>>10398834
>>10399382
butthurt low-iqs

>>10398140
>1x1x1x1=4

>>10397719
I could go with the >>10399382 philosophy, but I'm going to assume the rule that "it must be numerically sound with the current mathematical standtard". So through a few minutes of thinking, I get that each number represents the maximum number of the base in which it is expressed.
>1 - binary, 11*11 = 2*2 = 4
>2 - base 3, 22*22 = 4*4 = 16
>3 - base 4, 33*33 = 15*15 = 225
225 is the objectively most correct answer in this thread. You could also argue that you're a brainlet, and that's also correct.

>>10397719
81. Add the digits first, then multiply the results.

Wait,don't you have to sum the numbers in the product?
11 x 11 = 121
1+2+1 = 4
22 x 22 = 484
4+8+4 = 16
33 x 33 = 1089
1+8+9 = 18
IIRC they used to give us similar problems in school,but with more examples so we can find the proper pattern.

>>10397719
36

>>10397719
98?

>>10397719
24

There are two possible answer which we can get by two different method

Method 1 - :

If 11×11=4

That means ,

11×11=121

1+2+1=4

22×22=16

That means ,

22×22=484

4+8+4=16

So ,

33×33=1089

1+0+8+9=18

Hence the answer according to this method is 18.

Method 2-:

11×11=4

That is,

(1+1)×(1+1)=4

22×22=16

That is ,

(2+2)×(2+2)

= 4×4

=16

So

33×33

=(3+3)×(3+3)

=6×6

=36

Hence according to the second method the answer is 36.

what is this question even implying? is it trying to tell me that 11 x 11= 4? Because that's wrong. I refuse to answer this bull shit question. Who ever made this image can go deep throat a fat log of shit.

>>10397719

96 or 18

>>10398076
> (You)
> correct
FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING SAMEFAGGIHG FAGGOT
CAN'T EVEN BE FUCKED TO KEEP FROM COPYING YOUR OWN (YOU)
LICK MY SORES AND QUIT THIS BOARD
LICK MY SORES AND QUIT THIS BOARD
LICK MY SORES AND QUIT THIS BOARD