/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 89 KB, 724x543, image1018574763-4768-7544c67be85721915af42087900ea5d5@1x[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Jan 16 09:21:01 2019 No.10301054 [Reply] [Original]

what's the closest rational number to 0?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 16 09:24:07 2019 No.10301059

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 16 09:29:33 2019 No.10301075 >>10301059 this

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 16 09:53:58 2019 No.10301139 >>10301054 You probably meant irrational, brainlet.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 16 11:25:20 2019 No.10301292 >>10301139 i know what i said

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 16 12:13:02 2019 No.10301430 >>10301139 brainlet detected

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 16 12:16:45 2019 No.10301438 >>10301054 minus pi

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 16 12:18:44 2019 No.10301444 >>10301054 -0

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 16 12:18:57 2019 No.10301445 >>10301054 α where α is defined to be the next rational number after 0

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 16 12:19:23 2019 No.10301448 >>10301054 [math]\frac{0}{0}[/math]

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 16 12:30:44 2019 No.10301492 >>10301445 rationals are not well-ordered

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 01:17:02 2019 No.10303220 >>10301054 no such thing

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 12:33:59 2019 No.10304354 >>10301448 based

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 12:38:00 2019 No.10304361 File: 165 KB, 1191x1684, __remilia_scarlet_touhou_drawn_by_sasa_kichi__0e931e419910ad2ef269cb2218dbcea7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10301492 >this bait 10/10.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 12:43:31 2019 No.10304367 >>10301054 0/n where n is not 0

>>	Tuba Jam Thu Jan 17 13:24:46 2019 No.10304461 >>10304361 If you can order them, then tell me the first rational number. Oh wait, -infinity isn't a rational number #REKT

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 13:26:54 2019 No.10304464 >>10304461 what if you put Q in bijection with N and order Q the same way N is ordered ?

Tuba Jam Thu Jan 17 13:37:40 2019 No.10304488

>>10304464
yes, that's how you order it. A simple bijection would be to consider an infinite grid of fractions starting from x,y=1 and going to positive infinity with the x-axis determining the numerator and the y-axis determining the denominator. You can draw a line which which goes through each fraction once and skips similar ones (1/4 and 2/8)
I was just memeing, in case you couldn't tell.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 13:40:27 2019 No.10304493 >>10304488 i couldn't.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 13:40:51 2019 No.10304495 >>10301054 i

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 15:24:35 2019 No.10304772 File: 23 KB, 274x205, irrational.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10301054

>>	neutermind Thu Jan 17 15:25:28 2019 No.10304776 >>10301054 2 then 4.

>>	neutermind Thu Jan 17 15:27:54 2019 No.10304779 >>10304776 duplication of 0 results in 2 00 then duplication results in 4 0000, then duplication results in 8 irrational. a perfect circle.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 15:32:57 2019 No.10304792 Between any two rational numbers you can fit infinitely many other rational numbers.

>>	neutermind Thu Jan 17 15:39:03 2019 No.10304809 >>10304792 4 is a very important number can be considered as rational as zero; you need 4 for base 10, where 5 and 10 are a step over 4; 1 + 2 (is truly) 3.5 out of 4 because in theory it's heading toward the 4.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 15:39:52 2019 No.10304812 >>10304792 two distinct*

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 15:42:27 2019 No.10304822 >>10301054 .00000...01 / infinity

>>	neutermind Thu Jan 17 15:45:12 2019 No.10304826 >>10304822 3 and 1 are irrational faggot.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 15:46:02 2019 No.10304827 >>10304826 fuck you nigger

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 15:50:45 2019 No.10304835 File: 364 KB, 1600x912, IMG_20190117_204754.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10304827

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 16:01:34 2019 No.10304861 God.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 16:01:57 2019 No.10304865 >>10304861 Deep

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 16:25:16 2019 No.10304908 >>10304826 wrong

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 16:49:59 2019 No.10304955 >>10304908 Go ahead, try to express 1 or 3 as a ratio of integers. You can’t fucking do it. It’s impossible.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 17:02:46 2019 No.10304978 >>10304955 wow you're so funny dude

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 17:05:45 2019 No.10304985 >>10304955 1 = 2/2 3 = 2/6

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 17:10:39 2019 No.10304997 File: 91 KB, 645x729, 1533155796301.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10304985 >3 = 2/6

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 17:15:54 2019 No.10305009 You can easily prove no such number exists . >Let A be the smallest rational (positive or negative) >A/2 is also rational > It's smaller then A so A can't be the smallest

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 17:16:12 2019 No.10305010 >>10304978 Couldn’t fucking do it could you faggot

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 17 17:16:57 2019 No.10305013 >>10304955 5/5 , 15/5

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 18 11:36:38 2019 No.10306942 >>10305009 Incorrect.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]