[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 58 KB, 795x500, jon.cramden.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10294942 No.10294942[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>> No.10294947

>>10294942
No, it has a major genetic component. Which is even more apparent in AS/HFA.
Also next time, just use Google.
Neo/sci/ posts are so low effort.

>> No.10294951

Vaccines are caused by autism

>> No.10294952

>>10294942
>>10294947
Also, that child has Down syndrome not autism.

>> No.10294964

vaccines are caused by autism

>> No.10294974

At what age hitting your head agaisnt the wall because you lost a lego piece isnt considered autistic behavior?

>> No.10295068

>>10294947
What is neo/sci/?

>> No.10295077

>>10294952
How do you know he doesn't also have autism? The two diagnoses are not mutually exclusive.

>> No.10295087

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XUM2gvfbW8

CDC's own scientist said in court that vaccines and autism may have a relation to a mitochondrial disorder which is how someone won a case of vaccine having caused their autism. Some studies show mitochondrial disorders are apparent in a large portion of the autistic children we see which might be the link.

Take what you will from it, but that is what their own scientist said in a court of law. Know what happened after he said that? They kicked him out of court saying they no longer needed him and misquoted him.

>> No.10295113

>>10295087
>They kicked him out of court saying they no longer needed him and misquoted him.
based anti-science movement

>> No.10295134

>>10295113
They were looking at 5 cases, in the first he said vaccines and autism unrelated. case thrown out,
Second case comes out, his co-worker has a vaccine autism related injury in the family that he first-hand experiences. He now says vaccines and autism could have a link now. This case won but was put to the side because ??? and was treated as an isolated incident even though it represented 5000 cases.
Third case and on they relieve the doctor as a witness but still use his words from the first case as a blanket statement as if that was what his current beliefs were.

They basically lied in court, spoke for him using words that misrepresented what his beliefs were and intentionally made a false blanket statement without him present. They did some possibly illegal bullshit and there may be consequences.
This is not anti-science, the science is actually the least important part here, this is them bullshitting the court's legal system.

>> No.10295168

>>10295134
You seem to have a personal interest in this, anon. Do you have a close family member with ASD?

>> No.10295195

>>10295168
he's trying to give a fuck about this topic stfu

>> No.10295205

>>10295195
Steady on there, anon. No need to get your panties all in a bunch.

>> No.10295217
File: 37 KB, 437x373, dopamine hit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10295217

>>10294942