/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10291971
>indicating that you're not starving
Yes it is true that starving mother are less fertile and less capable of supporting children.

>>10291971
It's the space between her legs for the baby to gestate. Wider space, wider ass

>>10291971
>why is a big booty a sign of fertility?

Not booty but hip to waist ratio.

>>10291974
>starving doesnt impede a women's ability to reproduce
>it's okay if she breastfeeds herself to death
>why would pregnancy require lots of food anon?

>>10291971
Is that Lauren Southern? Sheeit

>>10291971
butts are nature’s “insert here” symbols

>>10291971
Fat distribution is an indicator of readiness for reproduction and health and shit. Imagine a girl with no ass but a beer gut. Even if she had wide hips it wouldn't look good. Fat distribution is controlled by hormones, probably some sex hormones so...

>>10291978
>>10291971
It's actually not. A big booty is a sign of infertility. The best hips for giving birth to babies is one that is short, wide, and flat.

The hips that are coming into vogue recently are ones that are very tall, and create an accentuated curvy look.

The reason is because a taller pelvis means that the waist transitions into the pelvis quickly, creating a curvier look. A shorter pelvis means that the transition happens along a long vertical gradient, smoothing out the transition.

>>10292054

>>10291978
>>10292054
you don’t know what you’re talking about

>>10292054
>>10291971
It's also why C sections are becoming more common, and have always been more common in Black women.

Another thing worth mentioning is that buttock fat deposits are more polyunsaturated than other fat stores. Polyunsaturated fats are known to lower the metabolism.

I think that this phenotype, and an attraction to the phenotype, is indicative of more "thrifty" genes. What you'll notice is that the elites of any society do not pay attention to such overtly sexual features, but instead choose graceful, beautiful women to marry.

It's also possible that increased societal stress is epigenetically/environmentally changing us by "tricking" our bodies into thinking starvation is around the corner. In such a scenario, big booty bitches would be superior. In a civilized society they are obsolete.

>>10292056
I've seen a lot worse, but still not optimal.

This is the kind of pelvis I'm talking about. Wide and short. If you were alive in the 90s/2000s, you'll remember that a lot of girls had bodies more like this.

>>10292070
It's also why low-waisted pants were so popular back then, along with the belly crop tops.

Nowadays it's all high-waisted stuff for women with anthropoid (ie; primitive) pelvises.

>>10292070

I like shorter women with WIDE hips and a flat stomach.

>>10291978
>>10292075
source

>>10292085

Just look up RollRoll

>>10292075
You don't like wide hips, you like tall hips. You could have hips that were the same width, but if they were short the girl would look a lot less curvy.

>>10292103

OK

>>10292063
I feel as if C-sections can’t be explained with purely physiological changes and there is some limited evidence that it is a socio-cultural anomaly born from flowchart medicine and not necessarily from sociobiological changes due to obesogenic and africanized McCulture

https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/2017/08000/Relationship_Between_Labor_and_Delivery_Unit.14.aspx

I think though the meteoric rise in c-sections some of it should be explainable with a higher proportion of women from developing countries of origin settling in first world nations with access to cheap health care, increasing autism (disproportionate head:body size) and like you’ve said changing (africanized) sexual selection preferences

Gluteofemoral fat and low WHR are associated with higher iq and lower costs to the mother’s fitness and likely ability to conceive subsequent high fitness offspring. What I can’t really understand is the idea that elites necessarily always select low BMI females, because as represented in Renaissance, as well as Greco-Roman artwork the divine aphroditic archetype is a low whr (though not nearly as low as now) relatively high bmi, robust cranio-facial feature women with small breasts (counter to the positive correlation of cognitive performance and breast size).

Whites typically select for large breasts, low whr and very low, almost unhealthy, bmi and as we all know emphasis on giant tits in an age of overweight cattle thots is much lower relative to gluteofemoral fat deposits. Maybe a mixture of white and nignog selection is the absolute best pheno for birthing continuous high iq offspring?

>>10292106
>Maybe a mixture of white and nignog

Hello ((leftist)) shill! MUST push the nignog on the whites.

Woman makes babies with bigger brains, who require bigger heads, which requires a bigger opening to pass through. Bigger hips, bigger ass.

>>10292133
that’s not true at all. you can have wide hips with a relatively low gluteofemoral fat deposits. the thigh gap nerdic/aeropostal thot pheno is evidence of this as are most athletic girls.

>>10292153
>thigh gap nerdic/aeropostal thot pheno
English please.

>>10292161
Go look at thigh gap memes and aeropostal models from the early 2010’s.
>Nerdic
is self explanatory

Yes, fat also is good at storing heavy metals like mercury, indicating the likelihood of non-poisoned offspring.

>>10291978
Disgusting creature not adhering to the golden ratio. You might have had a point but you posted this thing that really is a botched human. No super symmetry. No golden ratio. Yikes.

>>10292230
you're just spewing meme words

Are there infinitely many primes? Terence Tao Tao says there are infinitely many but he also says that 27 and 29 are twin primes so now I'm not so sure.

do you think she would be fertile?

>>10292270
You mean he?

>>10292070
Hip to waist ratio is not optimal.

>>10292106
>Whites typically select for large breasts, low whr and very low, almost unhealthy, bmi

uh whites don't select for a low BMI. Asians do. whites can be anywhere from Asian tier to black tier.

>>10292465
Actually, it is. It looks like a rough .7

You just think it's not optimal because you have stress and desensitization swimming in your DNA. You're used to seeing girls with WHRs of .6 and even lower.

>>10292468
>>10292465
For the record, I'm not trying to disparage you. I myself have this attraction to disgustingly voluptuous big butts as well.

However, that attraction can change for me. I go through phases where I find the voluptuous body shape mildly disgusting, similar to how I was back in my late teens. When I'm in this phase, I'm a lot smarter, persistent, cleverer, etc. as well.

I also have less of an "urgent" or addictive sex drive, and my erections come a lot easier. When I'm in this mode I don't care about vices or anger or any of the unproductive shit that bothers humans. I just have a very steady unshakable energy.

>>10292108
Does a leftie really have to explain to you how to properly dogwhistle, troglodyte? Its's ((())), not (()).
PROTIP: Try to act less like a shut-in maybe

There's a nude model "kamilla18", can't find a good clothed example, who has one of the nicest figures i've ever seen and it's all in the waist/hips/butt. The japanese model Yua Aida is another great example

>>10292474

read this

https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/papers/whrlassekgaulin2008.pdf

The tradeoff between large breast and high gluteofemoral fat stores i feel like has to be linked to scarcity and availability of high fat content foods like dairy and dense carbs like wheat and cereals (see: big booty arab gril; tiny tit steatopygic khoikhoi brides). You may be right that the attraction is the height of the hips skewing the lower midriff and upper lower-body morphology to reflect an exaggerated hourglass, also think maybe metabolic component makes sense too but low whr is definitely under selection in nearly all human socities primitive low bmi horticulturalists and hg’s and fat titcow mongering german and american civilization, it doesn’t make a difference.

Don’t know about my mentality during periods where i don’t crave venus idol pheno, just that i definitely agree i can get it up much more easily when i go for torpedo tits coke and vodka chicks and the classic 90’s tv gf you posted. But, there’s probably a racial difference in our preferences and I emotionally associate the black pheno with retarded vanity and would for that reason never date a woman like that.

>>10292968
both have the bodies of little girls, albeit with (really mediocre) breasts. i don't see the attraction.

>>10293096
>both have the bodies of little girls
> i don't see the attraction.
think about it harder, anon.

>>10293105
yikes!

>>10293096
Only a few of their pics really show what I mean. Can't post them here.

>>10291971
That's not a fat ass you faggot.

>>10293140
how dare you insult my waifu you retarded gay sack of shit.

>>10293012
>The tradeoff between large breast and high gluteofemoral fat stores i feel like has to be linked to scarcity and availability of high fat content foods like dairy and dense carbs like wheat and cereals

It has to do with availability of food in general. Note how Asians are the least shapely in this regard, and they've also been civilized (read: guaranteed calories) the longest.

When I crave the curvy body, my emotional/cognitive state is always underperforming. When I desire the skinny chicks, my metabolism just seems a lot higher, I predict and plan more, I get more questions right, win more video games, get more things done, and don't feel fatigued.

My sex drive is also "lower" but I find it easier to get it up, if that makes sense. Like I crave/desire the sex less, but I can perform more effectively.

>>10293116

>>10292968
both have whrs of about 0.67, which is slightly more pronounced than ideal. Beautiful figures in full frontals. Some great shots from behind/ass shots, mainly because of the hips. Never liked overly fat buttocks or thighs. True that these chicks have mediocre boobs though.

>>10293245
the pelvis isn't meant to be almost the same size as a head

>>10292261
>27 is a prime
Brainlet.jpeg

>>10293191
I see what you’re saying, going to try this during intermittent fasting, calorie deficit periods.

Aren’t asians a historically famished population though? Wouldn’t mediterraneans be the ideal for determining metabolically secure sexual selection standards? Id always assumed their physique/figure was the result of continuous high pop density, low caloric availability, low protein diets and low test.