/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10268735
No, the world is in fact slightly more dimensional.

>>10268735

No, because that isn't what the flat earthers are saying. The Earth would still be round as measured from within the encoded universe. And it wouldn't change things like the total inability of the flat earthers to explain the southern sky.

This whole thing just reminds me of supernodes in electronics.

>>10268735
>>10268775
The earth is a flat torus in 3-sphere, so topologically identical to the globe, but flat. This is why there is zero measurable curvature on earth, something that globalists constantly ignore.

The torus explains the southern star rotations etc, and fits nicely with electromagnetism.

>>10268735
No, because the dual theory is defined on a curved surface.

>>10269660
>curved surface
Show the empirical measurements of this curved surface. NOW.

>>10269671
In fact, it is claimed the earth is an "oblate spheroid", any physical measurements of this claim?

This whole holographic universe is just as cringey and stupid as flat earth

>>10269549
omfg im dead

>>10269755
>cringey and stupid as flat earth
Got any empirical measurements of your oblate spheroid's curvature?

>>10269760
>sphere
Point and laugh at this idiot. Everyone knows the earth is a doughnut

The earth is concave

>>10269759
>thinks the Foucault pendulum proves the earth is rotating

>>10269763
Keep dodging oblater cuck, where are your empirical measurements?

>>10269786
It's real in my mind

>>10269809
well since the universe is a 1-D array of qbits with uncountable many elements but finite extent, then that would imply it’s “real” in the physical sense too

>>10269809
Good boy *pats head*

>>10269819
No because that would mean people on the board would actually have gfs

>>10269819
Wonderful metaphysics, how about some actual science and providing empirical measurements of this oblate curvature?

>>10269829

>>10269831
well because of bulk eternal inflation dual to the boundary 1D spin network CFT, actually at some finite distance from you there is a bubble universe where you actually have a gf, Tegmark estimated it to be ~1.40*10^(64^1024) ly so arguably that is still “real”

The universe is virtual and consists of n-dimensional data on a 0-dimensional point. This can be trivially understood from the basic principles of matter/energy.

>>10269837
Isis, Ra, El

>>10269842
pls gib my gf

>>10268735
OP, Holograph Theory is retarded. The entire basis of it comes from the fact that space time is "flat", but it doesn't mean it is 2D. Here you are conflating flat with 2D like images on a paper or screen. It is no different than normies confusing a scientific theory with a conventional use of the word, meaning a guess. It is also because you are only familiar with Euclidian Geometry. All it means, is that the value of angles are always perfect, like a triangle always equals 90 degrees. The universe is still 4D (Width, depth, height, and time). It is also possible that the Universe only appears flat because of it's incredibly massive size, not unlike how your back yard seems flat despite the Earth being quite round. Either way, throw holograph theory into the trash, that is it's home and where it belongs.