/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10261205
>ergo

/sci/ - Literature

>for if not

>inasmuch

>therefor

>>10261205
>>10261214
>insofar

>because

>a

>whenceforthst'd'd've

>Let

>Furthermore

>>10261205
>This proves that

>yielding

>Hence

>As conclusion

>e.g.
:)

Not /sci/ related. Get out.

> Without loss of generality

>in contradistinction to

>a priori

>indeed,

>proxy

>suppose

>given that

>we see that

>let x be a fixed real
>thus we have proven it for all x

>by law of excluded middle

>using the famous epsilon over three method

>>10261205
>we shall suppose that

>such that

>>10261205
>finna be

>>10262104
>let x be such that...

>only insofar as

>>10261205
>the thing is, is that
>is is that

>has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

>>10261205
IB be like
>To what extent

>>10261205
>by extension

>>10261205

>[math]\therefore[/math]

>this is trivial

>>10261205
>by mathematical induction

>>10262111
Based trips

>>10261205

>which can be further rewritten as

im actually dealing with this shit right now

What's the matter? ST*Mtards cant read?

The Liberal ARTS major is the epitome of masculine dominance...

>>10262135
I do this one all the time

>Unsurprisingly,

>>10262764
treacher collins

im telling you now, if you dont do what i fucking demand


you truly are going to hell

but jews dont believe in it so, good shilling

>>10262767
>>10262778
simone la martina

callum taylor

if these people dont die within the next 2 years

you all wondered why you literally have nothing. you literally ask and beg and are denied at every moment

and most of you still havent seen the dream

>>10262788
i dont want to be ugly

>>10261380
i.e.

>>10262472
the proof is trivial; left as exercise to the reader.

>>10261205 >>10261254 >>10261733
>>10261500 >>10262104

>>10262807
The ring of rational polynomials feels really out of place tbqh.

>as one would obviously expect

>>10261205
>insofar

>>10261205 >>10262807

Definition 1.2

Theorem 1.3 ... Lemma ... Proof ... q.e.d

Corollary 1.4

Example 1.3

>Large, important theorem
>Lemma 3.2: ...
>Fundamental theorem in the field
>Proposition 7.5: ...

>we find

>"we all can agree that: "
>*drops personal biased opinion*

>moreover
>hitherto
>however

>consider that

>by the laws of mathematics
>by logic

t. discrete math students

>>10264110
>writes up the formula for the sum of all n
>passes a two inside it

>it is then clear that

>>10264110
i'm going to type this up as a personal adventure
i think that this is correct because according to De Morgans Law, Russells Paradox, direct comparison, bijection, bisection, the circuit, theory, uncontrollable power of the book of discrete mathematics, induction, proofs, even and odd numbers, there exists = \exists, \vee = or, \wedge = and, \aleph_0 = "aleph nought," the tragic experience that Georg Cantor experienced, Pascal, pythagoras, Euclid, the city of Israel, socrates, and all that is why n is greater than OR equal to one.
what the fuck

>>10264238
You're my hero

This particular student got zeros on every quiz and never turned in hw assignments

>We immediately get the following corollary.

>>10261205
>Suppose it is given that

>>10261205
For all natural numbers n ... i.e

∀n∈ℕ

>>10264490
>he doesnt use latex

>>10264493
>he doesnt use [math]\LaTeX[/math]

[math]\forall n \in \mathbb{N}[/math]

Are you satisfied?

>>10264509
yes, thank you

>The last claim is an immediate consequence.

>>10261205
>In conjunction with

>>10264364
i should have noticed the filename
i can't believe that's actually fucking real

>But let let us not be hasty...

>>10264840
Students wrote the weirdest shit in that class

>>10262838
hate this literally. just give me the proof properly as a whole dont divide it into 20931093 parts.

>clearly,

>we laboriously compute
>we write out the tedium for the reader
>we include all relevant computations
>we opt not to skip steps in this result
>we take the time to build some motivating examples

>provided that

>anyone with too much free time could verify the following result

>>10262493
>by mathematical deduction

>as noted/stated/proven/derived/etc. by X.
>as in you're some kind of lowlife pleb not worthy of consideration if you can't even tell what paper exactly I'm referring to just form the author's name and context

>assume

>>10262788
I've actually met the woman on the left
she's a really nice person

>>10262157
>TWE does this paradigm affect

>>10261205
these are my favourite threads

>>10262135
Bobby Lee? Is that you?

>>10262838
Literally all my papers are written like that, suck it

>X is an important problem in Y with various applications in Z
>Work in Z field
>Never heard of X
>mfw

>>10261205
3 days into 2019 and /sci/ already peaked

>As we know it

>it's not hard to see that

>thishly

>Presuming that.

>and but so

>>10266365

>>10266211
Lol! Not gonna lie Bobby Lee is is the reason I wrote that....

>ah! But...
>Obviously

I bought Sex at Dawn recently and started reading it. Jesus the writing...I can't do it.

>scientists say that....
>but what they dont take into account is...
>I am right

>>10266421
>ah! But...
I unironically love this shit

>so forth

>whence

>>10266477
>Bandersnatchedly'd'th've

>it is obvious that

>>10261205
>thusly

>and so on *sniff*

>>10264865
what was the whole question for (c)?

>>10264364
It's obviously a summary of everything the examinee remembered on this topic mashed into a single sentence. The teacher must be sick of getting back such answers but he shouldn't forget that it's exactly the situation such exams are supposed to produce.

really makes me doubt the intellectual progress human species though

>by logical deduction

>>10266567
For (c) they had to determine whether the argument "If it's sunny, then it will be hot outside. It's hot outside, therefore it is sunny" is sound, and why/why not.

As for the other answer, this was the only answer I've ever seen like that. Students often regurgitate definitions in an attempt to get some partial credit, and if the definitions are correct and relevant, I usually throw them a point. This particular student usually turned in either blank quizzes with no attempt at solving the problems, or wrote incomprehensible nonsense.

>>10264238
my sides

>I'd'nt've'd

>>10266586
does your student post on /sci/ under the name El Arcon perchance

>>10266557
>kid in middle school says "thusly" all the time
>we look it up
>something like "a pretentious way of saying 'thus' used by people who wish to appear intelligent"
>teacher has to convince us all to pretend we didn't see that

>>10266586
what do you think/feel when you get back such answers? would it be better not to write anything at all? what could science do to prevent something like this in the future or at least to reduce the rate?

>Evidently

>>10266675
sorry but every word has its own unique meaning. there are no two different words that mean exactly the same thing.

'thusly' used correctly it a sentence:

>Hence, the question might be posed thusly: “Shall the law take effect?”

'thusly' can only be replaced by 'is thus' so factually you save a letter (the space) and make a word out of a phrase

but it's not mutually exclusive: 'thusly' is a bit different than 'thus' but your collegue is still pretentious

>>10266692
I'd rather have any attempt at all than nothing, at least it gives me some indication of the thought they put into it. I laughed my ass off at that student's troll answer, because this student never seemed to even try to get help with the class. Never turned in a hw assignment, so I didn't get an indication of his understanding and he didn't get practice with the material.

>what could science do to prevent something like this
I have no idea. I think a lot of it comes from students not feeling confident about anything they do and they are scared to write down their thought processes for fear of being judged. which makes grading difficult because I don't want to destroy their confidence by marking them wrong, but I don't want to baby them and reward them for not learning the material.

>trivial

>[1]

>>10266775
I tend to think a lot about the way of doing exams nowadays.

There is a strong tendency to punish mistakes rather than rewarding correct answers.

It's a not a semantic difference but a sytanctic one but difference nonetheless.

I wonder if, in the times of AI and internet we could make unique designed exams so that different learning styles get respected.

e.g. I imagine a exam system where I could choose if I want to freely write about the topics or if I want a multiple choice heavy test.

Also I'm pretty sure there are so many old exams around the world and nothing is being done with them. I imagined one could scan through all the answers and use machine learning and crowdsourcing to come up with a question generation mechanism thats not just changing a variable.

I feel like science is already in the future but education is still in the past

>However,

>>10266801
>There is a strong tendency to punish mistakes rather than rewarding correct answers.
I agree. When I grade, I feel like I'm rewarding students who did everything right or were on the right track, but I don't know if students actually see it this way. When I get bad marks, I rise to the challenge and strive to improve. It doesn't make me want to give up but not everyone is like that.

I never thought about exams the way you said. It would be really nice to have a fair and equitable system where students could be examined based upon their learning style. I've never had an oral exam, but I feel like that gives the students more of an opportunity to express what they know. It sounds more flexible but I don't know what that's like in practice.

>>10266834
> I don't know what that's like in practice.
yea me neither or if its even possible for a matter of fact..

I imagine that we train an AI with all past exams to make predictions about a possible answer space (e.g. there are stupid answers but there is also a lot of stuff students will never answer)

this way the machine has a feeling what kind of mistakes or errors are happening and can spot patterns (e.g. the first part of the answer of a students exam from 2019 is very similar to the first part of the answer of a 2013 exam and the second part is identical to a 2007 exam) you can then somewhat predict the points possible for the 2019 answer deduced from older answers.

The way I imagine it is that teacher don't check exams directly but let AI do the checking and they only monitor what AI evaluates and make correction if needed.

as a teacher what do you think about that?

>>10266861
Oh I'm not the instructor, just a grader. Hope it doesn't sound like I'm LARPing as a prof. As for the AI stuff, I agree with you that AI and machine learning could really help with error assessment and evaluating the work based on past rubrics. This could also help alleviate implicit bias (although if the AI is assigning scores based on a teacher's past scores, this could just build the bias into the new system and perpetuate it).

I still wonder how to make students feel confident enough to write down more work. It would be a lot easier to grade if they would just explain to me what they're doing. I see so many apologies or pleas for reassurance ("am I doing this right?" or "is this correct so far?") on students' work.

>>10266834
kek imagine someone saying the first answer you posted in an oral exam
i don't think i'd be able to contain myself

>>10266908
Kek

>whenceforth
i love these threads

>>10266675
>implying saying thus doesnt sound pretentious to begin with

>>10262111
Top kek

>>10261205
>if and only if
>iff
>yiff

>>10262111 >>10262597 >>10266987
>Finna Be
Kek Lmfao

>if
>then
>else

Heyyyy! VSauce Michael here.

>>10262111
fcuk

>left as an exercise

>which will lead to the conclusion that.

> lecturer pronounces sinh as shine

>limit of f(x) when x tends to infinity

>Prove by circular argument

>>10261205
>A break in this rule
>Alternatively
>Using this easier formula...

>>10269848
>A break in this rule
proof by counterexample

>>10266365
This thread got nuked after this post. What happened?

>bump

>wat

>>10265260
story?

>>10265084
which touhou game is this from? WHY IS THERE SO MUCH TOUHOU ON THIS BOARD IN PARTICULAR???

>this can be rewritten as...
>completely different expression

>prima facie

>>10272198
Touhou 15.5 Antinomy of Common Flowers

Touhou was hugely popular 10 years ago.
The time frame that passed between
being a 14+yo kiddo and a 24+yo PhD
(I'm not a PhD, I'm just an undergrad)

It's sad that it's not popular anymore.
I really enjoyed the franchise during Grade School

It still the coolest Indie game ever made
(Touhou >>> Undertale)

& Koishi Komeiji is autistic mai >>>/jp/ waifu

>>10272242
>autistic mai >>>/jp/ waifu
Koishi is *my autistic 2D waifu

>>10272242
the whole openness of the touhou franchise is really cool. Shame I suck too much for any of the games and wasn't really into anime 10 years ago when it was popular.

>>10266224
LOL nice LARP fag. Your papers are a joke and so are you

>heretofore

>>10262731
I was fapping to those feet in the pic until I realized they belonged to the dude.

>simplification yields the result

>>10273075
>footfag
>literally a fag

>>10273420
Give me a break, feet can look very similar.

>>10272198
>why touhou on this board
why not? touhou is for educated people, unlike CAVEshit.

>>10273488
fuck off normal difficulty pleb. Everyone knows that playing easy games is for babies.

what makes these threads so funny?

>>10273538
I have no idea but they make me laugh

> ... spoke Zarathustra

>>10273488
I'm not complaining about it, in fact I've even played touhou 15 (I sucked though lol). What I want to know is why is it so popular here on /sci/ instead of any other number of anime? What's more, you pretty much never see low quality posts, bait, climate change denial, climate change denier-denial accompanied with touhou posts. They're almost always on high quality posts.
The rabbit hole gets deeper
>>10273488 I'm not complaining about it, in fact I've even played touhou 15 (I sucked though lol). What I want to know is why is it so popular here on /sci/ instead of any other number of anime? What's more, you pretty much never see low quality posts, bait, climate change denial, climate change denier-denial accompanied with touhou posts. They're almost always on high quality posts. The rabbit hole gets deeper The highest concentration of touhou posts is on /mg/, arguably the most serious, intellectually demanding threads on sci. (see: Yukari-poster sama)
It's as if there is a ssecret underground community of touhou fans with math PhDs.
How did this happen? Where did all these touhou geniuses come from? Where is the screenshot of a touhou mange resubbed with topology I've been searching FRO?

>>10275203
As I said, Touhou is the thinking man's anime memegame, and this is an imageboard, so we like to post images.
Would you prefer I post homestuck images?

>>10273538
nothing

> Similarly, this result yields the surprising conclusion that

>'twas

>>10266560
>and so forth

>>10268344
clearly it's sin-h'

>in before peyam sinch

where so forth
in so much as
hence
is wiser put

>>10261205
>as evidenced by

Clearly some people don't get it

>respectively

>holistic approach

>human

inter alia
where if the
per say
in regards to
of which were
where have given

>>10261205
>subjective opinion
>why don't they think the same as me

>>10261205
>independent thinkers

i wish to accord; in that it is so, therein/wherein the objective is.

(fuck) OP doesn't get his own joke.

>woke

>>10277056
>OP doesn't get his own joke
why?