/sci/ - Science & Math

literally who

>>10261690
Just say within 6 years.

>>10261707
In no less than 5 and no more than 6 years this man and his team will win the Nobel.

>>10261707
k, 5 would be cooler though, as a nice round number.

>>10261690
Who?

>>10261714
5 is a pointier number than 6. 8 is rounder.

>>10261690
>Quantum Gravity Research
Klee Irwin belongs in the trash.

>>10261690
Nobel is a political prize. It's not awarded for genuine accomplishments anymore. It's all politics. Obama got a "Peace Prize" for being black.

>>10261690
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Klee_Irwin

>>10261750
oh shi-

this is OP, I'm sorry for this and thank you for giving me the heads up, I was impressed by the video, but this guy is a clearly a scammer.

>>10261720
Of those, only 6 is a perfect number.
>>10261714
Absolutely Haram

>>10261768
>I was impressed by the video
anon... I don't know how to tell you this... you might be clinically retarded.

>>10261768
>I was impressed by the video
Truly, your level of research astounds me.

>>10261781
>>10261799

no, i'm actually pretty smart and like exploring new ideas, the E8 lattice might prove to be useful after all... do you know anything about this theory?

>>10261829
>no, i'm actually pretty smart and like exploring new ideas
>like exploring new ideas
Watching a dude's video is not a very high level of exploration.

>>10261848
its a start, right now I'm looking at the E8 lattice mathematics and getting into matrix theory. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E8_lattice

why are you so negative? what are you into /sci/-wise?

>>10261829
different anon
>i'm actually pretty smart
if youre smart youd know not to say that
>getting into matrix theory.
if youre only getting into it then you havent had enough ground to determine whether or not youre smart
>its a start
a start is getting halfway through a single textbook

>>10261891
k

nice damage control OP

>>10261690
A new challenger appears

>>10261871
>why are you so negative?

You seem to think that you can judge that someone's work is "next level Einstein stuff, and it will unleash new tech" while promoting pseudoscience. And then after being called out on your low level of research, you just insist that you're pretty smart, without any apparent introspection or even an admission that you put in an extremely low effort into this thread.

Right after saying that you're pretty smart, you say "E8 lattice might prove to be useful after all", another topic that I'm guessing you don't have any credentials to judge and just heard about somewhere. So I call you out again more explicitly about how watching a video isn't a high level of research. Lo and behold, you then confirmed that you're just getting into the math behind the E8 lattice and even matrix theory. And the link you post is not to a scientific source talking about the E8 lattice, but just a wikipedia article.

It's fine to not know things. It's fine to want to learn. But this all makes me believe even more that you think you can judge these sorts of things even though, when pressed, you admit you don't actually know much about.

And that's why I'm being negative.

guys, op is just a basement troll just trying to find pleasure in your guys’ gullibility, he’s probably masturbating to the fact that you guys are responding the same way he sees it in his thread. Just ignore this thread and don’t feed him

>>10262205
>>10262209

you sound like you know something or other, have you studied E8 lattice mathematics?

>>10261973
Real talk, that dude maybe has the best name ever.

>>10261690
Everything is a energy therefore it has frequency...
Every frequency can be put down to sinusoids by furrier transform.

Therefore world consist of triangles in higher dimensions.

What about it is "suitable" for nobel price?

People love these hardworkers, but Einstein is already surpassed in Brazil with the dark matter and dark energy theory and the new concepts of Physics. Not accepting little money for explaining that.

>>10261690
Go back to YouTube you brainlet

>>10262205
based,.
Get fucked OP