/sci/ - Science & Math

Could you not.
Please.

>>10250472
but this is the math board

>>10250425
What is the point of these threads? Do you think this is the first time this has been posted here this week? Are you just trying to piss people off? Do you think this is actually a good measure of intelligence?
I need to know for my study on retarded people.

>>10250480
>I need to know for my study on retarded people.
publishing your diary isn't research

>>10250425
>>10250473
https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-find-the-positive-integer-solutions-to-frac-x-y+z-+-frac-y-z+x-+-frac-z-x+y-4/answer/Alon-Amit

apple = 154476802108746166441951315019919837485664325669565431700026634898253202035277999
banana = 36875131794129999827197811565225474825492979968971970996283137471637224634055579
pineapple = 4373612677928697257861252602371390152816537558161613618621437993378423467772036

now fuck off

>>10250482
>>10250480
#Rekt

>>10250483
That's just positive integer solutions.

>>10250492
actually the problem doesn't ask for positive integer solutions in the presented form

>>10250482
>>10250487
At least wait til there's enough IPs on the thread before you samefag so that it's not so obvious.
Now let's see if the retard learns.

>>10250492
You want a negative pine apple, an imaginary apple and a positive banana?

>>10250501
believe it or not, that wasn't even me

>>10250483
awww, you ruined it. We could have had a lively bait thread but you just had to blurt in.

tried it with wolframalpha
result looked awful so I won't bother

>>10250515
kys

there are infinite solutions

>>10250492
>sets one of them to 0
>it solves itself lmao

i like how these memes use fruits and other foods instead of x y an z because normal people can understand fruits better for some reason

>>10250530
0 isn't positive

>>10250539
the problem statement still doesn't ask for positive integers

>>10250542
you were responding to someone who mentioend positive integers so i assume that was what you were going for

>>10250547
That wasn't me.
You also need to look further than one reply to grasp the full context.

>>10250530
no one will give you a free banana

>>10250549
yeah your'e right i read some of hte quora post and it mentions that :)

>>10250570
fucking retard

>>10250602
now that's uncalled for. >:(

>>10250425
[math] \displaystyle
\dfrac{4}{-1+11}+\dfrac{-1}{4+11}+\dfrac{11}{4+(-1)}=4
[/math]

>>10250739
How do you even star solving this without guessing?

bump

>>10252073
this fucking guy

>>10252089
>troll posts
>gets solved
>>not necessarily positive
>solved again
>bumps anyway

>>10252089
>>10252096
You niggers know you can post in threads without bumping, right?

>>10252096
>>10252104
but it's half the fun if you don't get triggered

>>10252104
already on the first page, so doesn't really matter

>>10252119
That is the worst excuse you could come up with and you know it. Even if you're not putting it on page 1, you are certainly keeping it there.

>>10252170
>you are certainly keeping it there

So the fun thing about these problems is that you can actually choose arbitrary numbers for x and y and there will be a solution (usually multiple) for z.

Like say we set x=4, y=2, then the problem reduces to:
4/(2+z) + 2/(4+z) + z/6 = 4
then we rewrite that to
z^3 + 6z^2 + 44z + 100 = 24(z+2)(z+4) <=> 24z^2 + 144z + 192

So with any given 2 numbers you can find a solution, and if error is acceptable you can even just do a really quick newton's method on this.

>>10253790
Btw, the solution I got for z using newtons method by hand was approximately -0.859234...

bump

>>10254163
Please let the thread die.

>>10254172
Why?

>>10250761
not being a brainlet is a good start

>>10254359
Common decency.