[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 434 KB, 630x1190, 109447C2-17FF-420F-90CB-1C3C75186EE1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10219435 No.10219435 [Reply] [Original]

>”research has shown...”
>”scientists say...”
>”according to experts...”

>> No.10219436

>"Al Gore says..."

>> No.10219440

>>10219435
The numbers don't lie!

>> No.10219441

>>10219435
The truth is all sciences are pseudoscience
Yes, all of 'em

>> No.10219442

Yes. The science is in on this one.

>> No.10219449

The scientific method is not perfect. Bias does exist

The peer review process is not perfect. Bias does exist

Both can be abused but they have brought us a long way and are still far better than any alternative

>> No.10219476

>>10219449
>The scientific method
No such thing.

>> No.10219486

>>10219435
>akshually according to neuroscience our faculty of detecting niggers is not as reliable we might think

>> No.10219529

>>10219476
No such thing he says while typing on his magic calculation machine

>> No.10219556
File: 67 KB, 480x608, 1481162429567.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10219556

>>10219435
>a thread died for this
And yet you believe the experts when they talk about their own fallibility? Where'd your usual skepticism go?
Isn't it nice that scientists can even write papers criticizing themselves?
You need to go back now

>> No.10219923

>>10219435
>”research has shown...”
>”scientists say...”
>”according to experts...”
Don't fall for sensationalist TeeVee-speak.

>> No.10219941

>>10219435
yes.

>> No.10219946

>>10219435
Too much ambiguity to start. Share the paper this comes from and maybe we can have a discussion

>> No.10219949

>>10219435
>qualified person vs. no-one

>> No.10219954

>>10219441
Maybe natural laws change based on who and where you are?

>> No.10220312

>>10219954
>natural laws

>> No.10220323

>>10220312
>Nature of reality

>> No.10220341

>>10220323
>implying science can extract any knowledge of that