/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10179898
What am I looking at here?

>>10179898
Post link.

http://dichotomytests.co.nf/

pleb tier romanticism :(

>>10179916

> How much do you agree/disagree with the following statement?
> I would rather be given an expensive car than save the life of a starving child.

That depends, if I don't have any connection with the child, or if my survival is not at risk then I will fucking get the car.
But I can't give that as an answer because I only have 5 options to choose from.

The site is retarded. I can only give relative answers, the test deals with absolutes.

>>10179937
>can't answer a simple xor question
>this site is fucking retarded
imagine being this stupid

What does this mean?

>>10179898
lets compare

>>10179950
It means you're a woman in faggot's body.

>>10179945
>thinking a trolley problem is solvable
imagine being this stupid

>>10179984
It's not a trolley problem, based pseudbro.

>>10179975
Weak

>>10179937
>get car
>sell car
>save the lives of thousands of starving children even if the original child died before that
>egoistic

I wouldn't say I'm that spiritual

the questions were not well made

what

What a waste of time

>>10180020
i.e would a society where you cant divorce be better than a society without marriage

>>10180020
I think the implication is a world without marriage is a world of hedonism, promiscuity, and lack of commitment and reproduction which is abjectly false. A world without divorce is a world of absolutism. It's a pretty stupid question

>>10180033
But it doesn't say can't divorce, it says without

So you have no idea if this is authoritarianism or idealism, at least beyond the absurdity of asking if no marriage is better than successful marriages

Perfectly balanced.

>>10179950
>That nihilism score
Oh no...

>>10179898
I got Objectivism (stupid) and Hobbesian (meh).

Most of the questions were dumb and my answers didn't come naturally.

>>10180054
Forgot pic

>>10179956
>>>/pol/

>>10179898
the biggest tell you're a brainlet is that you didn't get a 100% in pragmatism

>Give material answers to everything
>Higher in spiritualism
>I'm a prude
>Still get a substantial score in hedonism

>>10180074
Mathematics is idealistic.

>>10180074
>the biggest tell you're a brainlet is that you didn't get a 100% in pragmatism

Idealism is pragmatism

If you set the bar too high, of course we will never reach it, but we'll try harder than if we had shit standards

Let me ask you this, if you eat somewhere do you want the cooks to have an idealistic 100% handwashing rate or a pragmatic 98%?

>>10179898
>>10179926
>>10179950
>>10179992
>>10180000
>>10180014
>>10180028
>>10180039
>>10180078
What philosophies did you get at the bottom?

>>10179898
r8

>>10180085
There's nothing else on the page

questions seemed too vague at times

>>10180090
Interesting, I guess it only defined certain ranges.

>>10180085
I forgot to look

>>10180086
8/10 would build society with.

>>10179898
Whatever works.

tfw Platonic Catholic

>>10180085
I'm
>>10179992, got objectivism and hobbesian.

>>10180193
Absolutely disgusting.

So how do I interpret this

>>10180220
Are you me?

Heretics

How am I?

>>10179898

>>10179945
The point is that both disjuncts are vague, retard.

100% moralist pragmatist absolutist rationalist spiritualist.

Im based

>>10180085
Stoicism Monotheism

>>10179898
Got monotheism as my philosophy. That's accurate, but I also knew how to answer to get that result. So the test is a little invalid.

Objectivism and hobbesian.
Pretty accurate, I'll read about these philosophies now.

Not like I had anything better to do.

golden mean

everybody that gets a high nihilist score always has a high materialist and egoist score, only proving how shit nihilism is

>>10179926
same :(

Nice

...

Aristotelianism, Stoicism, Hobbesian

Scientism will not be tolerated

Not seeing enough rationalism, very sad

not surprised desu

>>10180101
That's exactly the problem with any of these tests. You can't put a blanket statement on everything.

>>10181537
Yeah on some of these questions I could write a full book. That would be a good test, same questions but you express your answer as a few hundred page book for each question.

>>10180995
Based

>>10181495
We are not mechanical men

Test has no idea what pragmatism is that's all I gotta say. It being the opposite of idealism is so painfully wrong.

>>10179898

>>10180193
>90% moralism
Woah. Explain optimal government pls

>>10181851
La Creatura...

>>10181886
Monarchy

>got objectvism instead of egoism
I'm disappointed.

>>10180868
I only answered statements in an objectively correct way.

>>10179898
Yep

>>10180193
>>10180407
>>10180995
>>10180514
Interesting how similar patterns repeat.

>>10181942
>objectively correct
>questions about subjective feelings
Totally dude

>>10179956
You are immensely based

>>10179898
It's really terrible test, a lot of these philosophical thoughts are interconnected. Like i believe morality, emotion and altruism have an evolutionary function which is selfish in origin where does that put me?

>>10179898

>>10179898

>>10179937
I see you're not a Sith Lord.

>>10179898
How do I compare.

Help

I felt a lot of these questions were too vague.

wtf

Oh oh...

am i retarded

>>10182342
I answered Yes as in Degrees of Freedom, but yeah, not very refined question.

>>10180492

This is what happens when your dogshit test deals with nothing but zero-sum questions without providing additional context to any of the situations.
Will there ever be a good test like that or will we forever be subjugated to braindead mongoloids after philosophy majors who make garbage tests like these to drain personality data from idiotic people who take them seriously?

>>10182342
Either choose strongly disagree or strongly agree because you have no choice.
Every other option is for the weak

bros

>>10179898

91% nihilist my boy!! Thats good

>>10182342
Strongly disagree is the only answer for non-brainlets

>>10182342
I would choose strongly disagree

>>10182396
This. I feel like it's way too balanced.

>>10180200
holy shit same

>>10179916
Retarded test. A lot of questions are impractical in nature and a lot of other ones make absolutely no sense. Stopped doing it at
>a world without color is darker than a world without order
I can’t be fucked to answer 70 more dumbass questions like that and you’re all fags for finishing it

>>10179956
>>10179975
>>10180193
>>10180407
>>10180514
>>10180898
>>10180995
>>10181949
>>10182075
>>10182276

B A S E D
A
S
E
D


BEGONE NIHILISTIC SCUM!

I wonder how many answered that they would rather save a starving child than get an expensive car. Bunch of virtue signaling fake faggots if you ask me. Children are starving and they are driving cars. Why don’t they sell their cars to save those children if they’re so pious?

>>10183260
Genius, sell the expensive car to “save”multiple starving children.

>>10183260
I drive a 2002 Celica that I gas up <5 times a year.

I also study mathematics with the intention of applying them to help Bariatric patients and dietics.
Not everyone is a materialistic, hedonistic, egotistic piece of shit.

>>10179898
not /sci/

>>10183222
>he believes in objective morality

>>10183260
I don't need a car because I'm not a burger and actually have infrastructure that isn't only asphalt roads

Not shown: Monotheism.

>>10183222
This.

>>10179937
You're a retard.

>Scientific research is more important than art and music.
Patently false.

>>10183297
Good and evil aren't predicated upon our subjective interpretations of them.

if you got >50% in absolutism, you're an idiot

>>10183349
>he doesn't believe in the existance absolute knowledge

Yeah basically I don't have strong opinions.

>>10180014
Agreed. So many of them were way too vague for me to even formulate an opinion.

What's your excuse for not being a rational sentrist and scoring 50-50 on this pointless test?

>materialism vs spiritualism
Recognizing the fact that subjective experience is different from the physical gives you about 50-50 score.
>egoism vs altruism
Putting yourself above others but being moral gets you 50-50.
>idealism vs pragmatism
Striving for good but accepting reality is what it is gives you roughly 50-50.
>hedonism vs ascetisism
Valuing pleasure over other things but striving for meaningful pleasures gets you 50-50.
>nihilism vs moralism
Nihilism is loser mentality, plain and simple.
>rationalism vs romanticism
Valuing objective actions but recognizing feelings are what gives things value gets you about 50-50.
>skepticism vs absolutism
Recognizing you can't know almost anything for sure, but some things are more likely than others gives you 50-50.

>>10183377
My dude

>>10179898
What is the name of this?

Did I fuck up, /sci/?
Not shown: Hobbesian.

>>10183388
>sentrist

>>10179898
Why is nihilism so high, am I autistic?

>>10179937
It also depends if the child is one of my people or just some nigger in Africa.

>>10179916
These questions suck fucking ass.

The Virgin Centrist

>doesn't have hard opinions
>"well, i guess it depends"
>iffy uh
>"Its only rational"
>deliberates on many questions and struggles with picking an answer
>>10180014
>>10180028
>>10180078
>>10180165
>>10180220
>>10180444
>>10180462
>>10180530
>>10180750
>>10180890
>>10180935
>>10181811
>>10182018
>>10182027
>>10182294
>>10182302
>>10182330
>>10182359
>>10182387
>>10182396
>>10182448
>>10182506
>>10182524
>>10183377
>>10183564


VERSUS


The Chad Fundamentalist

>has hard opinions
>knows exactly who he is
>either strongly agrees, or strongly disagrees
>doesn't care for other's rationality, picks what he knows to be right
>5 minutes or less on the quiz, questions are extremely clear to him and he has no trouble picking an answer
>>10179898
>>10179956
>>10179950
>>10180063
>>10180086
>>10180101
>>10180193
>>10180407
>>10180453
>>10180514
>>10180898
>>10180995
>>10181851
>>10181942
>>10181949
>>10183314
>>10183222
>>10183677

I consider myself well balanced

>>10180407
I'm pretty much like you.. hello, brother

>>10183778
I'm flattered anon

>>10183778
Centrism = Sane
Fundamentalist = pleb low hanging fruit

>>10179950
Too much Rick and Morty, anon

>57.3% spiritual
>72.7% altruistic
>53.8% idealist
>73.9% ascetic
>65.7% moralist
>53.4% rationalist
>54.2% absolutist

hmmm

>>10183817
How exactly is centrism the exclusively sane one of the two?

>>10183778
As if Chads would take this lame ass quiz.

>>10179898
>>10179992
>>10180000
>>10180063
>>10181851
>>10181942

>those hedonism scores.

>>10183778
please die you fuckin newfag cock sucker

>>10180868
Note the hedonism score as well.

>>10184060
>somehow a massive hedonist
How? Someone as serious as you should be Buddha-tier ascetic.

>>10184064
Just goes to show that skeptics and rationalists are nothing but a worthless bunch of degenerates.

Wtf im a retarded centrist

>>10183866
Strong opinion for such a flimsy ego-ed fence sitter.

>>10179898

>exactly 50/50
Is this why I'm so ambivalent?

mfs bragging about having a high nihilism score, congratulations you have loser mentality lmfao

Nietzschean master race

>Epicureanism
>Hobbesian

>>10185536

>>10179898
I don't understand which questions this quiz is interpreting as "material vs spiritual." I don't believe in "spirit" at all, and it gave me nearly 50/50.

>>10182342
You can tell the quiz was written by a brainlet, because this question is supposed (by the author) to be a measure of Materialism vs Spiritualism. Ironically, the majority position among philosophers is actually Compatibalism, where free will is understood to be consistent with material determinism.

>>10179898
I see your nihilism and raise you moralism, good-sir.