[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 48 KB, 550x550, pp,550x550.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10137995 No.10137995 [Reply] [Original]

Redpill me on EMF, cellphone towers and RF induced cancers.
I thought non ionizing radiation was save

>> No.10139386

>>10137995
>I thought non ionizing radiation was safe
it is safe. anyone who says otherwise is a conspiracy theorist anti-vax soccer mom

>> No.10139585

>>10139386
Is there scientific proof?

>> No.10139970

>>10137995
>this thread again
this >>10139386

>> No.10139982
File: 136 KB, 644x632, 1484663015011.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10139982

>>10137995
they dont cause cancer at all, if you just take the bogpill bro

>> No.10139986

>>10139386
>>10139970
>it is so because I said so
Wew

I just want a good thread about this topic without that autist popping up, with a clear grounded scientific answer

>> No.10140016

>>10139585
Yes, just do your own research.

>> No.10140637

>>10140016
Research shows both

>> No.10142268

>>10140637
No one knows
Right now it only produces thermal effects.
I can't find the source right now since it was one of my professors that comment me that there is research that suggest that emf is bad for growing infants.
We will see the results is 20 years if everyone starts developing cancerous cells or some other shit.
Either way we survive or the zoomers will be very fucked
t. Telecom engineer

>> No.10142280

>>10139386
t verizon

>> No.10142281

>>10142268
>the zoomers will be very fucked
they already are. the fewer the better imo

>> No.10142485

>>10142281
Not like you won't be overgrown with tumors too

>> No.10142490

>>10140637
bias

>> No.10142495

>>10142281
>imagine being so annoyed by based zoomers

>> No.10142536

>>10142281
>>10142495
samefage

>> No.10142539

>>10142536
how d'you find out?

>> No.10142540 [DELETED] 

>>10142539

>> No.10142548
File: 190 KB, 1116x1064, Screenshot 2018-11-15 alle 15.39.55.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10142548

>>10142539

>> No.10142552

>>10142548
u seem bored

>> No.10142658

>>10142490
For what side?
EMFags seem emotionally biased but have some good research while the other side could most likely be full of shilling with equally good arguments

>> No.10142673

>>10137995
all light weaker than UV light doesn't have enough energy to knock out electrons out of atoms
therefore nothing is changed as they enter and exit
so no it doesn't cause cancer