/sci/ - Science & Math

You can't

>>10036670
Psychedelics

>>10036670
Activate your junk DNA

Based namasensei.

>>10036670
You can, but the cost is a loss of functionality. Change entails both creation and destruction, and in this case added functionality seems to very much require deficits in what you were previously. This aspect of my mind has frustrated and maddened me the most throughout my life, I can store very concisely what "can be" and remember it at any time, but I can't be it at any time, and I can't have it all at once.

You've also have to accept that social functioning, self, identity, and so forth are regulatory and modulatory factors. Constant feedback loops that hold you to a certain range of states. I believe finding access to these hidden things would be easier, and possibly require, minimal social activity. Least that's when it happened for me.

Development of systems and low level interfaces to control your state, and engineer those states, is another matter. I can't really tell you how you work. You just draw on what you already know how to do and figure it out. Start really looking around and thinking about things, and thinking about thinking.

Anyway, I think the requirement of locating and tapping these features is extreme mental deconstruction. I descended into that and it took a long time to work my way out of it, but I've been thinking about it more and more recently. I've been trying to find a better way, where you can maintain your internal structure and anchor to a given layer, and go to these other places which are a super-reality, rather than a micro subreality expanded out. That was the intention in my initial design, and I created what I called "the switchboard" for that very purpose. Eventually I lost access to the abstract switchboard and forgot there was anything to come back to. Don't wanna do that.

Probably near char limit.

>>10037313
Lastly I would mention a feature of the mind that I came to assume existed, and then later found extensive backing for in the psychological literature concerning repeated trauma, dissociation, and compartmentalization.

It appears that we are not so crystallized as we might assume. And the bulk of what we are, know, think, feel, and our overall personality state, is in fact a bunch of structures strung together and controlled by a grander "superstructure". This superstructure knows much more than our "I" and the you that you may be at a given time. It has access to vastly more information, and switches your state according to some logic, which dictates what behaviors and information you'll have, This is how formations of alters works, in trauma related cases. In less extreme cases, this is how in some contexts you'll be primed for certain behaviors, and be more apt to recall memories of a certain kind, and in other contexts you'll be something much apart.

Becoming, or gaining some access to this superstructure is the key. It knows what you know. It knows what you don't know. It knows what's behind amnesia barriers. It knows who you've been. It might even have a model of the brain's global state, it might know everything. Those closest I've come to becoming the superstructure was after drinking a massive amount of vodka, and later on in the drinking, some kava. In the morning as the alcohol was wearing off, all the walls in my mind had come down. I was completely fluid and could be anything I wanted, with the slightest thought. That one short experience told me a lot about what we really are.

>>10037324
>I was completely fluid and could be anything I wanted, with the slightest thought.
Can you elaborate on this and tell more what do in practice to access those states?

>>10036670
>Sometimes in my dreams
Hmm lemme tell you a story. Probably not exactly what you're looking for, but it's interesting.

>Be me
>Never licked pussy
>Have dreams in which I'm licking pussy every once in a while
>Eventually get to lick pussy IRL
>Tastes the same as in my dreams
Explain