/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15714240
>>15714254
>Specifically, it is a "dynamic game" in that context, wherein strategies and payoffs evolve over time as individuals make decisions based on changing circumstances and interactions.
This is all society. Currently it is so, so the answer is like that. Then it will be that, and the answer will be another. This also hurts your case, because there is no equilibrium state of perfect understanding and harmony.

>Not every social interaction fits this model. Social interactions as they are are incredibly diverse- Not every interaction fits neatly into "cooperate or betray" In real life, social interactions are largely context dependent. They are not often not fixed payoffs as in your example.
IPD is a good model of social interaction. You can add more dimensions to it, I added "accept/refuse interaction" for example, the risk/payoff of the interaction may vary, it might not be clear what "cooperate" and "betray" are each time, some interactions may be neutral, but it doesn't change the underlying model of an IPD and its basic lessons: more interactions = cooperation wins, fewer interactions = betrayal wins, memoryless pure altruism = losing strategy, in-group vs out-group distinction = winning strategy. Nature didn't give you certain social instincts by mere chance, they were forged by deathly trial and error.
>Long term relationships [...] differ from the one shot nature of the prisoners dilemma.
I don't think you have looked into the ITERATED prisoner's dilemma. It's anything but one-shot.
While it may be too cutesy, check this out: https://ncase.me/trust/

Second post is you misunderstanding IPD and what I said. Of course cooperation and good faith is good. Pure altruism is suicide. Parasitic strategies still have their niche "at equilibrium" and you will never get rid of them. The first parasite among altruists wins all.
https://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

From an evolutionary perspective, conservative in-group preference makes sense. But how did liberal out-group preference evolve?

https://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

>>11383349
Yes

http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

>>11189905
This man says the truth >>11190081
Game theory supports tribalism.
Now if you bring competing xeno species it might change.

>>10762914
Game Theory

http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html
http://solargeneral.org/wp-content/uploads/library/The-Evolutionary-Dominance-of-Ethnocentric-Cooperation.pdf

>>10726342
Because universal altruism is an evolutionary dead end.

>>10206576
http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html
http://solargeneral.org/wp-content/uploads/library/The-Evolutionary-Dominance-of-Ethnocentric-Cooperation.pdf

Can we predict the future with science and math?