[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15254995 [View]
File: 2.33 MB, 1578x864, Charles Darwin.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15254995

If all people born* were the product of a mating strategy of some kind, then why do we surround sex in taboo and/or ideology?
Some people are hopeless about ever having kids because they forget they come from a long line of mating strategies, or people insist they should not have kids because it's their "choice" to not maintain their particular line.
They add cultural baggage that was never there in the dawn of hominids, nor are they there probably even centuries or decades ago. We probably do function quite the same as humans before us in terms of biological drive and instinct, but we have deluded ourselves with certain politics and culture, with the advent of technological modernity.
Mating strategies can be short-term (coercion, relationship-less sex, pure lookism), or long-term (monogamous relationship, resource saving over generations, many kids with child rearing). But today we have feminists or other political groups being very weird about sex; they even think it's "problematic" to discuss sexual dimorphism and biology, because of trannies or something.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]