/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11777661
>New World Order sounds like an escape from that.

History also teach us that ALL KINDS OF GOVERMENTS , almost everywhere on this planet have tendency to by the time INCREASING attempts to CONTROL OF THEIR OWN CITIZENS, which in the case of a government that has no other competition from any other government of other countries must inevitably lead to the creation of the worst possible forms of a totalitarian state, including the most sickly ideas in the style of government control of all official Internet content in its own country, as is already the case in China and Saudi Arabia, for example, or the obligation to wear location devices (OBLIGATION , not an option as in the case of current mobile phones), or logging on to social networking sites using only your own ID card.

In general, the establishment of a world government would be a REAL CIVILIZATION DISASTER - then politicians will only be able to make ice cream and raise taxes indefinitely without fear of someone fleeing to another country. In addition, the unity of power will not guarantee peace.
- It is never the case that one person has absolute power - there will always be someone or a group of people who can rebel.
- Lack of competition from other countries will spoil the state - there is no need to improve the state or maintain a reasonable level of administration and corruption - because no one will still do with the authority that can control the whole world order
-It's even an argument about a world without wars. -If there's only one country, there's simply no one to war with.

The example of Yugoslavia shows that not necessarily. In that case, we would simply call EVERY war on EARTH a CIVIL war.