/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12060593
Are you implying that climate change is a political discussion instead of a scientific one? I agree, and it should be discussed only on /pol/.

>>11267721
>"It has charge" does not in anyway explain how it was caused/exists
>"Charge is positive or negative" literally does not tell me anything conclusive about what "charge" is.

Correct, or at least I find nothing wrong with that logic. Would you like to add anything else?

>>10854407
>Zero

Therefore there is no mass in the center and the earth is hollow.

>>10442192
>space has properties to be altered.

No.

>>10395924
It's self-evident. By necessity. Things need an absence of themselves in order to "become" something else.

>>10395930
>Your entire field theory is a description, not an explanation.
Correct. Unifying what is already unified is a fools game. That's why it's not a theory. The universe is fields and fields are not particles. Fields exist by necessity, not because some moron described the effects of them.

>>10388973
>So you'll always say what causes electromagnetism and why it exists is unknown?

Unless it is explained properly as being self-evident and even then you have to elaborate why it is self-evident.

>>10373566
>A measure of acceleration
>fall