/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11905469
I don't know, probably depends on the person and their individual personality and circumstances. I can see someone who is a writer, or actor or director or likes to daydream conversations extensively having more personal value and use of their inner voice and subvocalizing for instance. Whereas someone more interested in ideas, and abstract and highly conceptual thinking would find more value and therefore use their unsymbolized thinking patterns more.....

Patterns, they really are just patterns we fall into or can deliberately follow perhaps.

So its not something inferior, depends entirely on the person. I'm sure a primarily visual thinker will find much value in their method of cognition if they are an artist for instance. And of course as I mentioned in earlier posts language is how we are exposed to concepts in the first place, so we still need it to be exposed to the idea.

The concept and operation of orbital mechanics is something I only learned through language even if that knowledge is now able to be used by my brain entirely in unsymbolzied form for instance when I'm thinking of what maneuvers to execute in KSP, to disregard language entirely like that is unwise desu