/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5576388
And yet no new evidence to the contrary has been found.

All the evidence points to the fact that the climate is changing and that the Earth will become at least two kelvins warmer on average, maybe more.

Furthermore, the evidence also shows that the climate change is almost solely caused by humans.

And lastly, the evidence also shows that it's not gonna be "warmer is good and profitable", but instead will cost everyone a huge amount of money.

Sage again for a climate denialist repeating the same stuff that has been proven wrong time and again.

>>5259231
Hello again.

So this is what the thread has devolved into?

One side posts facts along with sources, while the denialists respond bu staring into their own navels and claiming the other side is kooks and hippies.

Not that I'm terribly surprised, but I am rather underwhelmed about you denialists.

>>4996953
This.

All the natural causes mentioned in here either don't exist or have been taken into account and do not account for the warming.

>>4607176
>high school chemistry student is a more reliable authority than 95% of the world's climatologists
Dude, I'd say you went full retard, but that would be an understatement.

>>4259294
http://www.ted.com/talks/james_balog_time_lapse_proof_of_extreme_ice_loss.html

>thoughts on global warming?
It's this shitty thing going on with our climate, caused by avoidable human excesses and denied by political hacks for money.

>In addition to direct measurements of surface temperature, there are many other measurements and indicators that support the general direction and magnitude of the change the earth is currently undergoing. The following diverse empirical observations lead to the same unequivocal conclusion that the earth is warming:
>Satellite Data
>Radiosondes
>Borehole analysis
>Glacial melt observations
>Sea ice melt
>Sea level rise
>Proxy Reconstructions
>Permafrost melt

>There is simply no room for doubt: the Earth is undergoing a rapid and large warming trend.

/sci/ has been overrun by idiots because of all the race/religion troll threads. I doubt anyone here or anywhere else who actually works in science would doubt global warming is happening, and that humans are having some effect (though maybe not a huge effect)

don't know the source, it's probably very biased.

No one political ideology is always correct.

AGW is real, its extremely serious, but most of the effects won't kick in until after we are dead so good luck getting politicians to take action.

Let P be a point not on the plane that passes through the points Q, R, and S. Show that the distance, d, from P to the plane is:

d= |(a x b) (dot) c| / |a x b|

So I decided to do set

d= |QP| sin (theta)

Then,

d= |b| (|a x b|/ |a||b|)

Then the |b| cancel and I get

d= |a x b|/ |a|

Where does the (dot) c come from?

(Btw, the a, b, and c are vectors)

>>2536810
Wide-scale deforestation and release of fossil fuels' CO2 seem like fairly significant trends.

But I'm no climatologist.

I didn't think this was needed, but perhaps it is.

Presenting sourceless data is worse than presenting no data at all. That puts the OP's position in the negative.

/thread

/thread