[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.2650587 [View]
File: 38 KB, 470x353, AwesomeJimProfit0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2650587

>>2650583
So the earth travels around the sun in a day. We measure a day differently then we would in space. So lets just say "one earth day". To keep track of how much your body would age under such a circumstance. We could travel 875,000 miles per earth day under such a system. That sounds very impressive. Quite frankly... it is. But it's nowhere near lightspeed travel. Light travels at 186,000 miles... PER SECOND... Thats 16,070,400,000 per earth day. Albeit, I think we'd want to avoid lightspeed travel for fear of triggering that blackhole and umm...DEATH!!! Because at light speed, I am uncertain if mass can even keep it's composition. Some argue light has mass, just very very little. Others argue it's just "pure energy". I'm not going to argue which one, just that it's probably safer to avoid finding out. I will say the idiot who claimed you can see the mass particles in swirls like a flashlight is too stupid to know what debris and dust particles are.

NASA's rocket ships travel at about 17,500 miles per hour. Totaling in at 420,000 miles per earth day. Thats a little less then half of what I'm proposing we could be capable of. And at that, I'm being very conservative with Earth's orbiting rate. Pluto rotates in six motherfucking days, and obviously doesn't snap like a twig. But baby steps man...

>> No.2429766 [View]
File: 38 KB, 470x353, AwesomeJimProfit0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2429766

>>2429755
Forgot my trip and av. I can't do that at /tg/.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]