/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5738404
>I trap stupid motherfuckers like you all the time with my succinct statements. Dude, it's more than the silence of the sky. The sky's VISIBLE elements also contain no evidence of intelligent manipulations. You're clearly far too dumb to realize that ANY civilization that expands off its homeworld, automatically must run into energy problems in space around its star. So it MUST create a Dyson Structure. It may take 1000 years at high engineering action, or 1 million years... those are eyeblinks in cosmology. The point is that if there are civlizations out there, the sky would be peppered with Dyson Structures that occlude their home stars in very obvious ways.

Dyson structures are extremely unlikely and are Star Trek level retarded. We are technically capable of interstellar travel and we dont have Dyson structures. We have trouble find earth sized planets let alone space stations.

>
And if there were galactic civilizations, we'd still be noticing all sorts of interesting patterns crop up in the background noise. The sheer DENSITY of their emissions would produce aberrations that our SETI efforts would notice within a few days, if not hours.

Get out of your fantasy land. The idea of a Galactic civilization is retarded due to the speed of light and such being what it is. Interstellar communication would be done with high power inferred lasers which you would never pick up accidentally and are still bound by the speed of light.

>And yet: SETI shows NOTHING. For decades upon decades of all manner of signal searches, we have ZILCH.

SETI shows nothing because what SETI is looking for is impossible.

>"incoherent babbling"

durp hurp HURRR ignoring what i said before about radio signals being nothing but indistinguishable static in under a little over a light year.