/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14861188
Not worth the time. Stormniggers, ironically, don't have the IQ necessary to understand your arguments.
The more you argue, the more likely the thread suddenly gets pruned, especially if you start blowing them out, because they get frustrated and report the thread.

>>14846639
>Am I an idiot or are these questions in my economics class fucking horrible?
You're an idiot

>The question assumes that used cars are inferior and then says that people with low incomes will prefer used cars to new cars
Question says nothing about "low incomes"

>>14846664
Why would a viable alternative to the product not lower demand for the product?

>>14557881
>they only reduce the severity of symptoms.
they reduce both the probability of infection and the duration of infection
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0263014

>>14544587
>Look at Biden, he FIRST decides on the race and sex of the candidate THEN looks at qualifications.
But you could say this about literally every president we've ever had. In fact at one point, it was illegal for nogs to hold office. That doesn't mean that our white leaders were unqualified, right?

Think about it. For most of the last 250 years, we've decided on the race (white) and sex (male) of the candidate before even considering qualifications. And we still managed to elect many decent leaders. Therefore, the act of choosing race/sex before choosing qualifications doesn't hurt at all, as long as you end up picking someone qualified for the job.

>>11912374
Find me one country song that celebrates making money by dealing Fentanyl to drug addicts. In jew-owned mainstream media, only blacks write songs about doing drugs, fucking hoes at the club and killing any niggers who cross them.

>>11819281
This

Big-O notation isn't sufficient to analyze parallel algortihms; that's why we have the concepts of speedup, cost, efficiency, and cost-efficiency. Which, of course, OP will now claim are "obvious and self evident" despite being unable to even understand why we need them.

>>11819276
OP tries to apply Amdhal's law to parallel computation in a very hamfisted way and comes up short as undergraduates often do

>>11204985
Have you ever heard of a book club before, anon?

Here's how they work:
1. They pick a book (fiction, nonfiction, whatever).
2. Everyone reads some of the book.
3. Everyone meets and talks about what they read. Usually, one member leads the discussion.
4. Repeat from step 2 until book is complete.

Jamal showed up to my book club, but he skipped step 2. But Jamal was a trooper, so he still insisted on participating in step 3.
"Why doesn't John just shoot the hitman?" he asked, exasperated, unaware that John had discovered in a shocking and unforgettable twist that the gun was empty at the end of the previous chapter.
Everyone just looks at each other, annoyed as fuck at this negroid, because he hasn't even read the book, so why the fuck is he here wasting our time?
Afterwards, the negro complains privately that he didn't get anything out of the book club.
He expected that he'd understand the book if he just came to the club and participated in the discussion.

This is what you dumb ass niggers do in college and then you complain that you got scammed. Please leave.