/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6734531
Yeah I see what you mean about irrational views within all people, but I think we should at least strive to be as realistic and analytical as possible without putting too much weight on the validity of our emotional rationalizations or internally derived ration and logic.

>>6734559
It's based of a theory of personaility created by a German Psychiatrist named Carl Jung some many years ago. That picture specifically is in reference to the Myers-Briggs interpretation of Jungian personality theory.

It's a group of 16 different, encompassing personality types that anyone can fit within. But as was said before, these test aren't always accurate when taken by oneself due to personal biases that we interpret within our own behaviors.

Shouldn't stop you from taking it though.