/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8705277

>your degree
none

>your job
none

>>8041100
>experience with a "paramedic helicopter" has precisely 0 relevance to understanding either the performance or cost of a computer-controlled multicopter.
because this is not aboud performance or cost of a computer controlled multicopter
it's about how this is relevant to the application of emergency air extraction

>land, be *immediately* safe to debark and approach, and once loaded, *immediately* take back off and fly directly to the nearest hospital.
you're stuck in the mindset that emergency medical response works by driving towards the patient, loading him on a stretcher and rushing him to the hospital
that may have been the case back in the 80's, but things have changed drastically while you were in your basement building mad meme drones

stabilizing the patient is way, way more important than the speed at which he's being transported towards the nearest hospital
this takes time, hence GOLDEN HOUR, not golden minute
the helicopter waits for the patient, not the other way around
the fate of a patient whose medical situation indicates the need for air extraction is not decided by the speed or agility of the helicopter transporting him - full stop

now onto the actual technical details of drones versus helicopter, which you seem to be so hellbent about
>when this stuff is mature
"mature" implies that this drone can carry all of the equipment usually crammed into a paramedic helicopter, and an additional paramedic and emergency physician on top
one has to wonder what magical engines, props and batteries you have devised that will be able to carry all of this while retaining enough range to actually fulfill an adequate operational envelope to even be considered worth looking into

stop getting stuck on advantages/disadvantages
look into how things are actually done in the medical field before you proclaim your vision of actually being an improvement to it

>>7596830
>implying any amount of evidence will ever suffice someone who thinks that every piece of medical evidence is only sponsored and fudged by BIG SCARY PHARMA with the intent of suppressing "legit, natural and affordable" treatments
I refuse to put my own time and effort into gathering scientific papers as evidence when they'll get handwaved away as corporation propaganda anyway
seriously, fuck these people with a pitchfork

>>7570514
because you're a high school dropout who doesn't even know the most rudimentary rules of fluid mechanics
now get the fuck out with your perpetual motion bullshit, you retarded fuckwit

>>7545535
>LOL WHY HAS NOBODY THOUGHT OF THIS IDEA THAT I DONT HAVE A CLUE ABOUT
>HURFDURF OBVOUSLY IM SMARTERER THAN THOSE SIENTISTS
here's your 0/10 :^)
now go fuck yourself

>>7514694
>unironically posting this picture again for this topic