[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11869840 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, FC565C8B-1DD7-4C3F-94E4-67C25D43008F.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11869840

Why are some people really good at speaking to others with the meme emotional intelligence

>> No.9118922 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1405511640671.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9118922

>>9118896

>> No.5664879 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1365156272071.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5664879

Hi /sci/, I've gotten two particular solutions for:
<span class="math">\frac{d^{2}y}{d^{2}t}+{\omega_0}^2{y(t)}={F_0}cos({\omega}t[/spoiler]
<span class="math">\frac{d^{2}y}{d^{2}t}+{\omega_0}^2{y(t)}={F_0}cos({\omega_0}t[/spoiler]

The particular solutions are:
<span class="math">Y(t)=\frac{F_0{cos({\omega}t)}}{{\omega_0}^2-{\omega}^2}[/spoiler]
<span class="math">Y(t)=\frac{F_0{t{sin({\omega}t)}}}{2\omega_0}[/spoiler], respectively

Could someone please explain me what the solutions means in terms of physics?

>> No.4835335 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1326878397300.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4835335

HEY GUYS
GUYS
HEY
GAUSIE
WHAT IF - NOW HEAR ME OUT
WHAT IF WE
MADE A NEW COLLIDER
ON THE MOON
AND IT CIRCLES AROUND THE ENTIRE CIRCUMFERENCE OF IT
AND IT'S POWER BY THE SUN
GAUISE
SRYSLY
U GAUSE

>> No.4588721 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1295986358199.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4588721

So any of you faggots understand Sin and Cosine equations?

SinX= 2root/2

X=(-1)^kArcsin root2/2 + 180 * k, k e Z
X=(-1)^k* 60 +180 * k, e Z

so what does that solve?

>> No.4293729 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, moot activate it.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4293729

>>4293664
>\left[ \displaystyle{\vcenter{\rlap{\strut \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 3 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ \cdots }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} }\rlap{\lower{1.5em}{\ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 4 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ \cdots }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} }}\rlap{\lower{3em}{\ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 5 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ \cdots }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} }}\rlap{\lower{4.5em}{\ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 6 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ \cdots }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} }}\rlap{\lower{6em}{\ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ \vdots }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ \vdots }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ \vdots }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ \vdots }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ \ddots }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ \vdots }} }}\lower{7.5em}{\strut \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ 1 }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ \cdots }} \ulap{\qquad\atop\smash{ n+1 }} }}}\right].

Thanks for the crippled, borderline-useless latex feature, moot.

>> No.4014291 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, tumblr_l1yszooa7o1qa02x4o1_400.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4014291

boards.4chan.org /new/

It's open.

>> No.3897347 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, activateitmoot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3897347

time to kill this thread

>> No.3749194 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1297092504397.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Where: Imperial College London

Why: Got rejected from Cambridge but accepted my Imperial, and It wasn't like Imperial was a huge step down anyway. +London and in particular South Kensington is an amazing place to live. Loads of things going on. Got Ronnie Scotts Jazz club not far from me in Soho, and Knightsbridge, so I can go and gawk at all the stuff that I can't afford in the mega expencive shops.

Major: Materials Science and Engineering

Satisfied: Yep. I still have to do plenty work for my course, but compared to the guys doing the hard core Sciences and Engineering disciplines, I defo do less. That gives me more time to fuck around and enjoy myself though, so I ain't mad in the slightest.

>> No.2909427 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1296736118800.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2909427

>(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
>mfw
first ban i've ever seen on /sci/....fucking lol

>> No.2808624 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1294176272530.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2808624

>What exists "out there" in reality is moot.
>reality is moot.
>moot.

>moot

>> No.2349468 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1294862085615.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2349468

>> No.2336719 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1265620872106.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2336719

>>2336701
Where is Colonel Coffee when we need him

>> No.2272977 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1265620872106.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2272977

>>2272973

>> No.1943426 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1265620872106.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1943426

http://www.marshallbrain.com/manna5.htm

>> No.1918669 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1265620872106.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1918669

>>1918662
Go into Google Maps, and zoom up on the westernmost part of Tasmania.

>> No.1825515 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1265620872106.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1825515

>>1825509
Imagine a space elevator with the same technology, only up.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/article4799369.ece

It's beginning.

>> No.1681562 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, MOOT.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1681562

>> No.1616029 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, moot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1616029

You guys are all a bunch of dumbass hypocrites. You think you're smarter than everyone else in the world... well guess what? You're not. You think being good at math or knowing a bunch of facts makes you "smart"? Let me tell you something, you don't want to be "smart". Being "smart" sucks. You might make more money? What is "money"? It's worthless, just paper, everything around you is worthless. You place value on these things in your lives... they are what keeps you going. They are worthless. Your lives are pointless, I would advise you now to go find a drug dealer, buy an ounce of some good pot, and think for a good long time about your life. Because if you want to continue living this life, you might as well just be happy for the rest of it, and not be a rat in a maze like you are now. You don't need to find the answers that are waiting to be found out there in the universe, because you'll never truly understand them! Ever!

>> No.1331402 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, activateitmoot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1331402

ITT: We imagine a world where people couldn't lie. Like they just aren't capable of lying.

I'll start: No religion. No politics.

>> No.1326042 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1274755276322.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1326042

In the state of nature, men are expendable.

I want you to keep in mind the above law as you read my brief take on F. Roger Devlin’s outstanding (and MSM blacked out) essays on gender dynamics and the sexual revolution. The truth of that law is the explanation for everything you see around you today.

I found the link to Devlin through 2Blowhards with interesting followup commentary. You can read the essays here. Scroll over the icons, hit the down arrow, and click download for easiest access. This is a must read for anyone who wants to know why things seem to have gone off the rails. Devlin’s essays are long but I urge you to read them through, including his evisceration of Wendy Shalit, representative of those obtuse anti-porn crusading social conservatives and myopic “fourth wave feminists” who preach from a pulpit of willful ignorance, habitually missing the forest for the trees:

[...]the notion that all our problems come from women’s making sex available outside marriage—and, consequently, that a “holding out for the wedding” strategy will make everything right again—deserves a close, critical look. Wendy Shalit’s writings provide a useful occasion for doing this. Her proposals have considerable limitations, in fact, most of which flow from a single source: feminine narcissism and its concomitant unconcern for the masculine point of view.

Devlin’s essay Sexual Utopia in Power contains this nugget of truth:

>> No.1144545 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, 1274755276322.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1144545

If you released some antimatter into space what would happen? Would it just sit there? Would it react to gravity?

>> No.987965 [View]
File: 85 KB, 379x298, activate it.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
987965

The era of synthetic life has begun.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]