/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16082484
Incorrect, vaxxie. No refunds. Cope and seethe.

>>16082420

>>16079749
It isn't my narrative, bumblefuck, the vaccines prime your immune system for constant and worsening reinfection with SARS-CoV-2, increasing the odds of chronic, or "long," disease symptoms. Now considering how rare long-term effects are from any viral infection generally, it's fair to imagine that the one thing most of the world consented to taking en-masse at the height of a viral pandemic may be a significant contributing factor.

>>16078401
>Results COVID-19 occurred in 1475 (3%) of 48 344 employees during the 100-day study period. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower in the “not up-to-date” than in the “up-to-date” state. On multivariable analysis, not being “up-to-date” with COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, 0.77; 95% C.I., 0.69-0.86; P-value, <0.001). Results were very similar when those 65 years and older were only considered “up-to-date” after receiving 2 doses of the bivalent vaccine.

>Conclusions Since the XBB lineages became dominant, adults “not up-to-date” by the CDC definition have a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination, bringing into question the value of this risk classification definition.

>Summary Among 48 344 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, those not “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination had a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date”. The current CDC definition provides a meaningless classification of risk of COVID-19 in the adult population.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.09.23290893v1.full

>>16073297
I don't know, but it certainly causes a higher likelihood of covid depending on the number of doses administered.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.09.23290893v1.full

2023 study shows negative correlation between number of doses administered and protection from covid.

>>16072014
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.09.23290893v1.full

>Results COVID-19 occurred in 1475 (3%) of 48 344 employees during the 100-day study period. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower in the “not up-to-date” than in the “up-to-date” state. On multivariable analysis, not being “up-to-date” with COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, 0.77; 95% C.I., 0.69-0.86; P-value, <0.001). Results were very similar when those 65 years and older were only considered “up-to-date” after receiving 2 doses of the bivalent vaccine.

>Conclusions Since the XBB lineages became dominant, adults “not up-to-date” by the CDC definition have a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination, bringing into question the value of this risk classification definition.

>Summary Among 48 344 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, those not “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination had a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date”. The current CDC definition provides a meaningless classification of risk of COVID-19 in the adult population.

>>16070238
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.09.23290893v1.full

>>16069847
>Results COVID-19 occurred in 1475 (3%) of 48 344 employees during the 100-day study period. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower in the “not up-to-date” than in the “up-to-date” state. On multivariable analysis, not being “up-to-date” with COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, 0.77; 95% C.I., 0.69-0.86; P-value, <0.001). Results were very similar when those 65 years and older were only considered “up-to-date” after receiving 2 doses of the bivalent vaccine.

>Conclusions Since the XBB lineages became dominant, adults “not up-to-date” by the CDC definition have a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination, bringing into question the value of this risk classification definition.

>Summary Among 48 344 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, those not “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination had a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date”. The current CDC definition provides a meaningless classification of risk of COVID-19 in the adult population.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.09.23290893v1.full

>>16068918
What's all this about?

Do you ever feel duped, or do you plan on living in denial for the rest of your lives?