/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6349774
11/10 troll

You sure rustled a lot of jimmies.

>>6272068
>free will does exist.

Are you fucking serious? How hard did you fail neuroscience?

>>6177776
>Meteorology is a hard science

>>6069076
>>Have to be able to read logical expressions and symbols like its your first language

>>5915019
>serious study of consciousness

>>5855869
>unable to understand the point
>uses the term "point-dodging"
<
>>5855895
>projecting
You are not going to make me do your kindergarten homework, you decadent moron. If you are too impotent to understand such banal material, there is no hope for you; I may as well be talking to a wall, if you or that poster is so flagrantly ignorant to claim they know what special relativity is yet lack the elementary knowledge in statistical physics to see the difference between the entropy of any distribution on the phase space of a model with and without a preferred frame. Similarly, if you would like to possess some knowledge of what the Griess algebra is, it is generally a requirement that you are able to compute correlation functions in conformal field theory - a prerequisite necessary on the students' part to comprehend.
>>5857759
No, I am not. We are not discussion gravitation or that pseudo-philosophy at all. There is no such thing as an "undetectable preferred frame", btw.

>>5838116
>actually it's everything there is in formal logic

>>5825044
>I have so many degrees I can't count them on the fingers of my hand

obvious troll is obvious

>>5786848
>Only high school kids use Occam's razor

>>5773640
>but i do respond to science threads

>>5749178
Take <span class="math">\frac{10^3 - 10^3}{10^3 - 10^3}[/spoiler] for example.
Following the same logical path, <span class="math">\frac{0}{0} = 3[/spoiler]

For every <span class="math">\frac{a^n - a^n}{a^n - a^n}[/spoiler] where <span class="math">a, n \in \mathbb{Z}[/spoiler], you get the solution <span class="math">\frac{0}{0} = n[/spoiler]

Meaning that there is no unique solution <span class="math">\frac{0}{0}[/spoiler].

You've proved nothing.

>>5708679
>>5708700
>>5708710
>>5708714
>>5708746
>>5710017
>these images

>>5683558
>it's a hard topic.

>Bachelor of Software Engineering
>Income $100,000–$150,000

>>5650271
>that you all for the most part have a very good understanding on the topic being discussed about

>>5638517

>>5630957
>it's an element

>>5625268
>She is intelligent

>>5616231
>Relativistic quantum lock
10/10

>>5595223
>claims to have a degree in psychology
>doesn't know about statistics and sampling bias

>>5586345
>Newton’s laws aren't physically measurable. The equations of electromagnetism aren't physically measurable
oh wow, my sides

>Religion resorts to “God did it”. That is objectively simpler than what you call a “natural” explanation and offers you the same predictions.
10/10

>>5583383
>people here are less simple minded and more open to the notion that they could be wrong.

>>5578244
>Neural networks do not operate with "algorithms"

>>5556627
>i am a STEM major