/sci/ - Science & Math

>science proofs that blm riots are good

>>12124190
>The most devastating example is his dishonest and inept response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which cost more than 190,000 Americans their lives by the middle of September.
>He was warned many times in January and February about the onrushing disease, yet he did not develop a national strategy to provide protective equipment, coronavirus testing or clear health guidelines.
lol, except trump started the task force a day or so before the who called for a global emergency.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Coronavirus_Task_Force
>Also referred to as the President's Coronavirus Task Force, it was established on January 29, 2020.[2]
meanwhile pelosi and company were telling people to go to parades and calling people racist for being concerned about it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-HAZsXPm6A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSv5_g1vrYc
>It wasn't just a testing problem: if almost everyone in the U.S. wore masks in public, it could save about 66,000 lives by the beginning of December, according to projections from the University of Washington School of Medicine.
funny how masks were discouraged so hard by "experts" at the start of the pandemic.
https://www.businessinsider.com/who-no-need-for-healthy-people-to-wear-face-masks-2020-4

>>12123966

>>12109305
it doesn't matter that you're a wage slave. what matters is that you're contributing to science.

>>12092126

>>12090133

>>12087347
>facts

>Publish-or-perish: Peer review and the corruption of science
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/sep/05/publish-perish-peer-review-science
>The Effects of Corrupted Peer Reviews on Scientific Credibility
https://www.enago.com/academy/corrupted-peer-review-affects-scientific-credibility/
>Most scientists 'can't replicate studies by their peers'
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778
>In Psychology And Other Social Sciences, Many Studies Fail The Reproducibility Test
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/08/27/642218377/in-psychology-and-other-social-sciences-many-studies-fail-the-reproducibility-te
>Many scientific studies can’t be replicated. That’s a problem.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2015/08/27/trouble-in-science-massive-effort-to-reproduce-100-experimental-results-succeeds-only-36-times/

Reminder that if you still trust "scientific consensus" you're an idiot. The sciences have become hopelessly corrupt, peer review is just a rubber stamp for people with the right connections. It's especially bad in places like China and India, corruption everywhere.
Scientists are human beings with moral and intellectual failings just like everyone else. They have agendas, both personal and political, like everyone else. You're a fool if you see them as infallible paragons of truth.
Science is not a person or group of people. It's a listen of steps that anyone can follow. That is what determines whether something is scientific or not, not the word of some "pop scientist" like Richard Dawkins, Bertrand Russell, or Bill Nye.