/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9480976
>with many shorter ones missing because of the curvature.

That's where you're wrong kiddo

This is a known phenomenon of atmospheric distortion caused by the rising water molecules at differentiating temperature levels. Much like you see waves over a desert rose that cuts off images the same effect happens over water.

Durthermore you can see far more of the buildings than that should be hidden. Only the TOPS of a handful of buildings would be visible

>Also what about the moon landings?
Clear fakes

There is no dust on the moon landing pads yet in their very own images there are footsteps in moondust caused astronauts only inches away from the thrust engine

>What about Ferdinand Magellan and his many fellow ship-men who experience the curvature of earth every day?

Did they really? You do realize you can travel around a flat earth too right? You do realzie that these explorers never went point A to point B around the earth but had countless stops and reorientations zigzagging around the earth which is possible on a flat earth.

>Why would you trust one photo from a balloon when you don't trust others?

There's 10s of different of independent balloon launches showing no curve. Flat earthers never tried to lie to me or deceive me but NASA has and scientists tell me unproven facts about the universe are facts while also claiming science and going against their own scientific standards. It's fraudulent.

>>9480979
I don't know perhaps bouyancy and density in combination with electromagnetism

>>9480986
No they appear to be spheres but flat objects can be spheres too. I don't believe they are flat though and likely are spheres but do you get the point I am making?

Also just because every ball on a pool table is a sphere does that make the pool table flat? No. Every light bulb in your room is high above and is a sphere but does that mean the floor is flat? No.