[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9534547 [View]
File: 36 KB, 500x378, ayy lmao plus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9534547

>>9533849
>NUKE
>NUKE
>We come in peace
>NUKE
>NUKE
>NUKE

>> No.7051279 [View]
File: 40 KB, 500x378, tumblr_mverfjZl7t1qkgh4go1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7051279

so i cant read english as well as you bright scholars.

what the fuck are they saying here. their wording is so fucking confusing.

"A table (relation) is in second normal form if no nonkey column (that is, a column that is not part of the primary key) is dependent on only a portion of the primary key"

I think the whole "part of the primary key" or "portion of the primary key" is confusing me or some shit. someone please explain to me in different wording please.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]