/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7500970
Push electrons erryday

>>7203459

Tell me about all the deep thoughts you think OP.

>Prove the universe is larger than the observable universe.
You should have phrased it in a less ambiguous way, like that:
Prove the universe is larger than the universe we can detect with our current level of technology and theories.

Answer: we can't.

>>7032371

>>6944878
Just saw this last night. By far my favorite movie I've ever seen. It took a lot of great aspects from 2001 and Sunshine

The effects department did a really pretty job of illustrating relativity during the scene when cooper was redocking the lander to the station right after matt damon blew it up with his dumbassery

>>6586469
Interesting

I'm the opposite. I love to think.

I was boxing the other day and got hit a few too many times and I got a (very) minor concussion. This made me afraid that I might not be able to think as effectively if I continued. So I considered quitting.

I read "Surely you're joking, Mr. Feynman" recently as well, and in it he describes the reason he quit drinking for good and not doing psychoactive drugs as it frightend him that he might be losing his cognitive abilities


but I said fuck that because I love boxing. I just have to learn how to protect my head more effectively

>>6497367
I got banned for saying that Cosmos is for science casuals and they should gtfo. I've been banned for being an ultrafinitist, even though there are otherwise respected mathematicians that have shared that opinion, or opinions like it. Our janitor is remarkably capricious and wants /sci/ to be a hugbox for high school students.

>>6456340
No theories have been falsified by being a nice guy, welcome to science motherfucker.

Why is the speed of light exactly 299,792,458 m/s?

Why isn't it 301,788,230 m/s? Or, why cant it be 299,792,455 m/s?

What dictates this speed?

>>6387925

>>6355370
>seriously all the guy needs to do is go out around people and not talk to them and eventually he'll find someone that talks to him, assuming he knows how to pretend like he is open to approach (through body language), without really even trying.

but that's untrue. women DO. NOT. approach a shy guy even when they convey an open body language. that was the whole point of my fucking post. there is a disparity between the genders when it comes to this scenario.

and in the off chance that a woman DOES approach the shyguy, she is put off by his lack of confidence. so she won't date/sleep with him.

I have first hand experience with this shit. I have always had to approach women lest I become the creepy asshole in the corner.

seriously how disillusioned are you from the real world?

>>6289490

Everything you say is wrong because you're quoting a dogmatic cultist.

What, i have to teach you the basics of thermodynamics to show you how energy density cannot scale?

It's a cult. A cult based entirely on this image.

Any real scientists out there?
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.658836

Can you please upload this somewhere?

Thanks a lot.

>>5804770

editiing html.....nice.

>>5783754
>could of

fuck, you really are a damn dirty ape.

can you build a modern computer out of a single element, assuming an unlimited supply of that element? The manufacturing process can involve other elements. Nuclear fussion creates elements and relly's on one element and is barred from your response.

Ps, what resources (minerals, petroleum...) do we need to make quantum computers?

>>5678363

>>5534817

you'll be entering a saturated and heavily competitive market. Only the best have a chance at years of mind-numbingly dull work for very little pay.

You'd make more delivering pizzas.

Reflect on this image.

people who actually love science won't be anywhere you can find them.

/thread