/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8593473
>you're claiming that the data depicted here >>8583533 doesn't count because of processing and "corrections."
literally not what he claimed. try again.

>>8593541
designated/10

>>8593708
>provide evidence
>For people wanting to rule the world all through history? That's a special kind of naivety and a waste of time with ample examples available, read some more history.
>there was a conspiracy about something once
>therefore my conspiracy theory is true, no evidence required

>>8593797
>This is /pol/, not /sci/ by the way
:(

>>8593880
>simply highlighted the completely scatterbrained and impossibly complex approach to the new age political religion known as climatology
so basically this:
>hey anon, all these independent groups investigated and found that there was no cover-up, no conspiracy, no nothing.
>WHAT
>THAT MEANS THEY MUST ALL BE PART OF THE CONSPIRACY
whenever something throws cold water on your meme, it magically becomes part of the conspiracy too. because the ONLY way anyone could disagree with your whackadoodle claims is by being a conspirator, right? NO WAY could you actually be wrong, right?
this is why you guys can't be convinced, no matter how much evidence is presented to you. if it disagrees with your uhpinyuns, you just throw it out.

>>8593909
>It doesn't matter if it's unusual if the effect is negligible.
amazingly enough, the effect isn't negligible, you ninnyhammer, you blithering fuckwit, you stinky testicle.