/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8845083
>there is no identity politics here beyond maybe, issues that appeal to losers and shut-ins
I assume you mean IQ. There are definitely alt-right identity politics threads started up here using IQ as a springboard to compare in infographics, things that people are likely to take at face value without examining the source. They get summarily debunked every now and then, but, as ideologues tend to do, they just keep ignoring it and hoping it'll go away instead of taking a moment to nuance their positions.
warosu.org/sci/thread/8833056#p8834310

In context, the other extreme IS being represented by the political statement that the March for Science is trying to make. See >>8841624
>Systems of privilege influence who becomes a part of the science community
>Science itself can drive our conversations about the importance of diversity
>We pledge to amplify the work of underrepresented scientists
All indicative of far-left ideologues looking to give biased funding to researchers that will support their political leanings. There's nothing more relevant than the March for Science Web page itself.

>>8843517
It's not even about nobility. It's that they omit important parts of their figures, argue off of them, then ignore any arguments and cited studies that they can't answer to. They just rinse and repeat when the mods delete the thread.

Check this post:
warosu.org/sci/thread/8833056#p8834310

>friendly reminder that you don't need any actual data to pull an infographic out of your ass

>>8834295
A more complete list:
>>8834089
>>8834217
>>8834040
>>8834037
>>8834035
>>8834032
>>8834030
>>8834028
>>8834023
>>8833907
>>8833321
>>8833205

all unrefuted