/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11617820
Only from context later was I able to deduce it meant the orbits. Nasty notation, isn't it?

>>8809210
The need to preserve the future and the past on pillars that shaky is questionable. A universe must be strong or it will perish. This is interuniversal Darwinism.

>>8799149
Please do check it out. It's nothing but MTF gender dysphoria and translesbianism.

>>8688479
The first one is epsilon-delta, the second one is characterizing contituity by demanding that if [math](x_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}[/math] converges to some [math]c[/math], then [math](f(x_n))_{n \in \mathbb{N}}[/math] converges to [math]f(c)[/math], the third one is from topology, the fourth one I don't recognize, and the fifth one is what it means for a functor to be continuous.

That [math]\ell_{\infty}[/math] makes me think of those taxicab norms and the such, there was the series one. I guess [math]c[/math] is a constant mapped into the reals by some linear operator, and then this is plugged into [math]f[/math], but on the other hand, it is made a series, which is eventually mapped into the reals. This would then make it a generalized element. Not 100% sure, though.