/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9930868
OP didn't mention the part where you pick a door before the host opens a door, but it was close enough otherwise and most (adult) people tend to start with a holistic notion and then automatically gloss over errors or gaps when it comes to reading. It's great if you can overcome that tendency and spot problems other people would miss, but it's kind of shallow-minded to suggest people have poor reading skills for behaving according to a well established psychological tendency towards holistic inference. That's a lot like saying people have bad spatial judgement skills if they misjudge circle size in an Ebbinghaus illusion picture. It's not really a poor skills issue, these are both consequences of useful features our cognitive processes operate in terms of.