/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9964671
>caring about what happens after your death and the immediate end of the universe

what is the problem?
i dont understand
what OP wrote is true

that doesn't make sense
if [math] R_0 [/math] has size m by 1, then R has size AT LEAST m+1 by m+1
but because R has R at 2,2, the size of [math] R_0 [/math] must be m+1
so the matrix is either infinite in size or there's an error somewhere

>>8521861

>analysis
>intuitive

analysis is like 90% counterexamples to things that you previously thought were intuitive

>>8182177
>Today I learned Light doesn't have an absolute speed and changes depending on your reference frame.

one sentence into your post and you're already wrong

>>8029220
>want to find shortest path between the 20 starbucks in my town
>have to do literally 2432902008176640000 computations
this is why we dont like brute force