/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7758715
What is this thing you are advocating we do?

Optimize resources more?
Genocide Africa and India?

I'd love to hear what extreme measures we must do. Instead of a vague "spread awareness" bullshit.

The fact is I believe it's entirely reasonable to make the trade off of higher carbon concentration for accelerated economic growth. Especially if that economic growth leads to advancements in scientific funding.

The current investment in R&D worldwide is still relatively small and having a worse worldwide economy would reduce it further.

A bike analogy might work. Pedaling as fast as possible might be the best thing keeping humanity alive. Economic slowdown or deepening recession might increase extinction risk factors.

Slowing human momentum down which might happen under many global warming solutions might be the worst possible choice for human survival.