/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15652407
stats don't lie

>>15582909
>So I figure if they are bigger and more developed the amount of toxic aluminum and mercury and god knows what else would be of less risk to them.
Sound logic.
Also, 90% of the "vaccines" are not needed.

>>15553567
>And then boom you can debunk the antivaxers just like that.
But they cannot, because you cannot debunk facts, and all facts point to "vaccines" being a major health problem.

Here is the scary part, it is on purpose. To create more pharma-dependent populations and to make the populaces of certain areas weaker and easier to control overall, by the rich 1% elite.

>>15531776
>LEFTISTS, they are not "liberal" at all, but fascist, just like their previous versions.
>OP, "vaccines" have become another depopulation agenda. That's why people don't trust the medical establishment anymore, along with all the lies they were exposed telling during the so-called "pandemic".
This.

>>15148047
>Those other vaccines don't exactly look safe either...
They never have been.
I used to think antivaxxers were fringe crazies, but they had very valid scientific points all along, especially with the rise in forcing vaccines on children.