/sci/ - Science & Math

>>>/a/54906592
that's what that anon said:
>I'm an actual scientist (protein engineer) and I wouldn't touch /sci/ with a 10-kilometer long pole. I feel like an Olympic athlete at a kid's playground there. Plus, it's roughly half high school science club and half religious people/trolls. As a molecular biologist I especially can't stand the occasional anti-evolution / anti-bio faggotry in there. It's not even worth my time to explain to such simpletons because 4chan just doesn't lend itself as a good platform for lecturing people on.
>Also, I find it funny how it seems that most who don't hail from these parts think that the waifu thing is some kind of super-serious pathological obsession, when in reality 90% of the people here casually claim one just to fit in or have something to talk about; it takes all of <1 second to claim any random character, and no one to stop you from actually caring about it or changing your mind. It's more of a way of identifying with each others' tastes and confirming with each other which characters we like on a long-term basis, in a fashion that does not directly pit each other head-to-head. By just posting who we think is awesome and nothing more, we can share our thoughts and tastes without engaging in open combat with each other over our differences. Some people are much more confident in their choices than others, and some people treat the whole thing like a pissing contest to see who can prove that their choice is best.

Are you going to defend your honorable name from these revolting accusations, /sci/?

>>3741622

lol

>>3738622

are you a summer or you have been hibernated for years?

>>3707155

>anon
"omg how do you know it??"

>>3698846

>>3698800

http://www.okcupid.com/profile/Gavinfoxx

seriously?

>>3696251

>implying there are only photo-voltaic panels
>implying no thermodynamic solar and no Stirling engines
>implying this isn't just a simple example and that there will be not a lot of new solar powered and more low power consumption devices

>>3691664
>correlated with g

meh.. I usually reach very high scores in g-factor intelligence tests, but I seem to be pretty slow in this (270ms).

btw some times ago I did a medical reaction test and I think I did better with the sound based ones (click when beep) reaching the maximum level. who knows..

>>2479165
>As logarithms are positive
>implying entropy is negavie
>implying the logarithm isn't a surjective function over R.
anyway, nice derivation