[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15022850 [View]
File: 191 KB, 150x156, image0-2.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15022850

>Missing links
There is not a SINGLE transitionary fossil. We find fossils of different animals on top of each other with no transitions between them.

If all life on Earth went through evolution, we'd find COUNTLESS transitionary fossils but we can't even find ONE.

>DNA
Mutations can't add new information. They can only delete, duplicate, or rearrange DNA. This allows for some genetic variety among animal kinds and even natural selection, it can even be observed short-term. The lie is when you claim this same biological process can turn a single-celled organism into all life on Earth, for which there is no scientific basis.

>Origin of sexual reproduction
There is no known way asexual creatures could develop sexual reproduction through mutation. Any such benefits (or the obvious -50% efficiency) are irrelevant. It's not possible.

This is what we call irreducible complexity, one part is useless without the other part.

>Horseshoe crabs claimed to be the same for 400 million years
They claim you were a fish 400 million years ago.

"They're just perfect" is not a legitimate answer to how an animal could remain unaffected by evolutionary force for 400 million years while others went through extreme changes.

>Origin of life
This isn't strictly about evolution but it's part of the belief in evolution. There's no known way to turn non-living material into life, it's never been done before even in a lab. The chances of even of the most basic life randomly appearing this way is zero, even on a timescale of billions of years, in all but a philosophical sense.

1/2

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]