/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11177590

That's not what levelized costs means and even your own source doesn't consider renewabkes viable for baseload applications.

You'd know that if you even bothered to read the source instead of spamming the same graphs you don't understand in every fucking thread.

>>11154135
>>11154138

>like clockwork, the renewable jew pulls out charts from a source that itself advocates for nuclear as an emissions free source of baseload

Godspeed shitposter-kun.

>>11139919

>uses a source that doesn't consider renewables viable for baseload...again

>>11134092
>>11134117

Your own source does not consider wind and solar viable for base load.

Get fucked.

>>11112606

>do my research for me because I only vomit graphs I don't understand because anti-nuke doesn't read

Here you go. Not that it matters since your goal is to hate nuclear.