/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11944636
Notice how I make a statement that is true and then you post an article that you didn't read that you think refutes my statement but if you had taken just a few moments to actually read the article after frantically googling it...you would realize it doesn't.

The obvious reason is that you are a gigantic smooth brained faggot who thinks replying with "nuh-uh retard" is actually a valid argument. Do you really think Saturn's rings are not part of Saturn? Do you not find it pretty strange that even if Mars was geologically active in the past that it would be normal for it to have geological features that completely dwarf anything on the most geologically active planet in the solar system that is also twice the size...or any planet for that matter?